Usage Score
9.1
Player Dossier
2022-2025Mississippi State
S • 6'1" • 190 lbs • Tuscaloosa, AL, USA
Brylan Lanier shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 28.8 disruption score.
Usage Score
9.1
Efficiency
28.8
Consistency
12.8
Season Value
37.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · Mississippi State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Brylan Lanier, S. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · Mississippi State. Brylan Lanier shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 28.8 disruption score.
Brylan Lanier played S for Indiana and Mississippi State. Across 3 tracked seasons, Brylan Lanier recorded 132 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Mississippi State.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Mississippi State paired 9.5 primary output with 28.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 28.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Indiana, Mississippi State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Florida
Loss with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
0.7
Efficiency
28.8
Usage
9.1
Consistency
12.8
Best Game by takeover score
Florida
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Wake Forest: 1. Southern Miss: 1. Arizona State: 0.5. Alcorn State: 0. Northern Illinois: 0. Tennessee: 1. Texas A&M: 0. Florida: 5. Texas: 0. Arkansas: 0. Georgia: 1. Missouri: 0. Ole Miss: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wake Forest: 2 by 18.3. Southern Miss: 6 by 35. Arizona State: 3 by 17.5. Alcorn State: 2 by 8.3. Northern Illinois: 5 by 20.8. Tennessee: 4 by 26.7. Texas A&M: 4 by 16.7. Florida: 8 by 83.3. Texas: 4 by 16.7. Arkansas: 7 by 29.2. Georgia: 7 by 39.2. Missouri: 6 by 25. Ole Miss: 9 by 37.5
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Florida
Best efficiency game
83.3 vs Florida
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/3 | vs Wake Forest | L 29-43 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 11/28 | vs Ole Miss | L 19-38 | 9 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/16 | @ Missouri | L 27-49 | 6 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/8 | vs Georgia | L 21-41 | 7 | 6 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Arkansas | W 38-35 | 7 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/25 | vs Texas | L 38-45 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/18 | @ FloridaSplash game | L 21-23 | 8 | 7 | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/4 | @ Texas A&M | L 9-31 | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Tennessee | L 34-41 | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Northern Illinois | W 38-10 | 5 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/13 | vs Alcorn State | W 63-0 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Arizona State | W 24-20 | 3 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/30 | @ Southern Miss | W 34-17 | 6 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Indiana
2022
Opening stop
Mississippi State
2024-2025
Final stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | Indiana | 2 | 11.7 | 2.8 | — |
| 2024 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 3 | 20.9 | 4.4 | 1 |
| 2025 Postseason | Mississippi State | 9.5 | 28.8 | 9.1 | 6.5 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 9.5 | 28.8 | 9.1 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Florida
Loss with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
5
Primary metric
5 disruption/tackle impact with 76.7 takeover score.
#2
Georgia
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 50 takeover score.
#3
Texas
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 48.3 takeover score.
#4
Maryland
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 48.2 takeover score.
#5
Massachusetts
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 39.7 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2025 Postseason · Mississippi State
9.5 primary output · 28.8 efficiency · 9.1 usage
37.7
#2
2025 Regular Season · Mississippi State
37.7
9.5 primary · 28.8 efficiency · 9.1 usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · Mississippi State
16.3
3 primary · 20.9 efficiency · 4.4 usage
1
Impact games
2
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Career Facts
2
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
132
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 31 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.