Usage Score
7.8
Player Dossier
2021-2025Wake Forest
Dylan Hazen
LB • 6'1" • 239 lbs • The Woodlands, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Dylan Hazen shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 32.6 disruption score.
Efficiency
32.6
Consistency
30.9
Season Value
21.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason · Wake Forest
21212223242525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Wake Forest
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: NC State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Dylan Hazen, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason · Wake Forest. Dylan Hazen shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 32.6 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason
Wake Forest paired 0 primary output with 12.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 32.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: NC State
Loss with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · Wake Forest
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
0.9
Efficiency
32.6
Usage
7.8
Consistency
30.9
Best Game by takeover score
Mississippi State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Mississippi State: 0. Kennesaw State: 0. Unknown: 0.5. NC State: 3.5. Georgia Tech: 0.5. Virginia Tech: 0. Oregon State: 1. SMU: 0.5. Florida State: 0. Virginia: 1.5. North Carolina: 3. Delaware: 0. Duke: 1.5
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Mississippi State: 5 by 20.8. Kennesaw State: 5 by 20.8. Unknown: 5 by 25.8. NC State: 9 by 72.5. Georgia Tech: 6 by 30. Virginia Tech: 6 by 25. Oregon State: 3 by 22.5. SMU: 7 by 34.2. Florida State: 4 by 16.7. Virginia: 7 by 44.2. North Carolina: 6 by 55. Delaware: 6 by 25. Duke: 4 by 31.7
Split Comparison
Wins0.8 · n=8 · -0.6 vs Losses
Losses1.4 · n=4 · +0.6 vs Wins
First Half0.8 · n=7 · -0.3 vs Second Half
Second Half1.1 · n=6 · +0.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
NC State
Best efficiency game
72.5 vs NC State
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/3 | @ Mississippi State | W 43-29 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/29 | @ Duke | L 32-49 | 4 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Delaware | W 52-14 | 6 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/15 | vs North CarolinaSplash game | W 28-12 | 6 | 2 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 11/9 | @ Virginia | W 16-9 | 7 | 5 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Florida State | L 7-42 | 4 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/25 | vs SMU | W 13-12 | 7 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/11 | @ Oregon State | W 39-14 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/4 | @ Virginia Tech | W 30-23 | 6 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Georgia Tech | L 29-30 | 6 | 3 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 9/11 | vs NC StateSplash game | L 24-34 | 9 | 6 | — | 3.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Unknown | — | 5 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 8/29 | vs Kennesaw State | W 10-9 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Wake Forest
2021-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
2021202120222023202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Postseason | Wake Forest | 0 | 12.5 | 1.8 | — |
| 2021 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 0 | 12.5 | 1.8 | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 3.5 | 17.3 | 4.4 | 3.5 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 9.5 | 40.5 | 14.2 | 6 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 7.5 | 36.4 | 8.8 | -2 |
| 2025 Postseason | Wake Forest | 12 | 32.6 | 7.8 | 4.5 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 12 | 32.6 | 7.8 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
NC State
Loss with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5
Primary metric
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 64.5 takeover score.
#2
Army
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 63.1 takeover score.
#3
Duke
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 63.1 takeover score.
#4
North Carolina
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 60.9 takeover score.
#5
Old Dominion
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 60.4 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2021 Postseason · Wake Forest
0 primary output · 12.5 efficiency · 1.8 usage
38.1
#2
2021 Regular Season · Wake Forest
38.1
0 primary · 12.5 efficiency · 1.8 usage
#3
2023 Regular Season · Wake Forest
25
9.5 primary · 40.5 efficiency · 14.2 usage
Milestones
5
Impact games
6
Splash games
4
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2026 · Rating 0.85
North Oconee · Bogart, GA
- Committed To
- Georgia Southern
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2026
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
275
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 47 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.