Player Stats

Al-Jay Henderson College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
2,598
Rushing yards
2,134
Receiving yards
464
Touchdowns
21

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2021 Regular SeasonBuffalo00000-
2022 Regular SeasonBuffalo1034630145332.7
2023 Regular SeasonBuffalo5000129.3
2024 PostseasonBuffalo1315511936176.1
2024 Regular SeasonBuffalo131,161959202976.1
2025 Regular SeasonBuffalo12936755181769.8

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason

Buffalo paired 1,316 primary output with 52.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 46 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2025 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Bowling Green

Win with 126 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 91.7th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Regular Season · Buffalo

Games

12

Scrimmage Yards / G

78

Efficiency

46

Usage

32.1

Consistency

70.4

Best Game by takeover score

Bowling Green

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Minnesota: 25. St. Francis (PA): 140. Kent State: 113. Troy: 111. UConn: 81. Eastern Michigan: 111. Massachusetts: 68. Akron: 69. Bowling Green: 126. Central Michigan: 39. Miami (OH): 22. Ohio: 31

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Minnesota: 11 by 23.7. St. Francis (PA): 26 by 48. Kent State: 23 by 51.7. Troy: 25 by 40.1. UConn: 27 by 28.9. Eastern Michigan: 18 by 57.3. Massachusetts: 24 by 30.2. Akron: 13 by 60.2. Bowling Green: 19 by 69. Central Michigan: 9 by 45.1. Miami (OH): 7 by 32.7. Ohio: 5 by 64.6

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins111.6 · Games = 5 · +57.6 vs Losses
Losses54 · Games = 7 · -57.6 vs Wins