Player Stats

Darryl Peterson College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
134
TFL
24.5
Sacks
14
QB hurries
10
Passes defended
6

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2021 Regular SeasonWisconsin22-0--036.5
2022 Regular SeasonWisconsin1024222-021.6
2023 PostseasonWisconsin1330.501-059.5
2023 Regular SeasonWisconsin13449.54.532059.5
2024 Regular SeasonWisconsin11281111017.4
2025 Regular SeasonWisconsin113311.56.533065

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season

Wisconsin paired 24 primary output with 29.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 29.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Illinois

Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Regular Season · Wisconsin

Games

11

Havoc Plays / G

2.2

Efficiency

29.8

Usage

12.7

Consistency

30.4

Best Game by takeover score

Illinois

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Miami (OH): 2. Middle Tennessee: 0. Maryland: 1. Michigan: 2. Iowa: 2. Ohio State: 0. Oregon: 1. Washington: 0. Indiana: 5. Illinois: 10. Minnesota: 1

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Miami (OH): 2 by 28.3. Middle Tennessee: 2 by 8.3. Maryland: 1 by 14.2. Michigan: 2 by 28.3. Iowa: 4 by 36.7. Ohio State: 2 by 8.3. Oregon: 5 by 30.8. Washington: 1 by 4.2. Indiana: 6 by 75. Illinois: 6 by 75. Minnesota: 2 by 18.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins3 · Games = 4 · +1.3 vs Losses
Losses1.7 · Games = 7 · -1.3 vs Wins