Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason
Arkansas State paired 8.5 primary output with 17.6 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Tackles | TFL | Sacks | QB Hur | PD | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Regular Season | Georgia Tech | 4 | 5 | 1 | 0 | - | - | 0 | 17.7 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Georgia Tech | 8 | 16 | 2.5 | 0 | - | 1 | 0 | 21.7 |
| 2023 Postseason | Georgia Tech | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | - | - | 0 | 17.4 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Georgia Tech | 5 | 8 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | 17.4 |
| 2024 Postseason | Arkansas State | 11 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | - | 0 | 52 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Arkansas State | 11 | 25 | 3.5 | 2 | 1 | - | 0 | 52 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason
Arkansas State paired 8.5 primary output with 17.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 17.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Georgia Tech, Arkansas State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Iowa State
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 90.9th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
0.8
Efficiency
17.6
Usage
9
Consistency
15.2
Best Game by takeover score
Iowa State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Bowling Green: 2. Central Arkansas: 1. Tulsa: 0. Michigan: 0. Iowa State: 2. Texas State: 0. Southern Miss: 2.5. Louisiana: 1. Georgia State: 0. UL Monroe: 0. Old Dominion: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Bowling Green: 1 by 24.2. Central Arkansas: 1 by 14.2. Tulsa: 3 by 12.5. Michigan: 3 by 12.5. Iowa State: 5 by 40.8. Texas State: 3 by 12.5. Southern Miss: 2 by 33.3. Louisiana: 1 by 14.2. Georgia State: 2 by 8.3. UL Monroe: 3 by 12.5. Old Dominion: 2 by 8.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.