Usage Score
3.7
Player Dossier
2021-2024Ohio State
CB • 6'1" • 195 lbs • Suwanee, GA, USA
Jordan Hancock shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 20.7 disruption score.
Usage Score
3.7
Efficiency
20.7
Consistency
51.1
Season Value
25.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Ohio State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jordan Hancock, CB. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Ohio State. Jordan Hancock shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 20.7 disruption score.
Jordan Hancock played CB for Ohio State. Across 4 tracked seasons, Jordan Hancock recorded 98 tackles and 2 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2023 with Ohio State.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season
Ohio State paired 0 primary output with 6.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 20.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Marshall
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
15
Havoc Plays / G
0.7
Efficiency
20.7
Usage
3.7
Consistency
51.1
Best Game by takeover score
Notre Dame
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Notre Dame: 1. Texas: 1. Oregon: 0. Tennessee: 0. Akron: 1. Western Michigan: 0. Marshall: 3. Michigan State: 0. Oregon: 1. Nebraska: 1. Penn State: 0. Purdue: 2. Northwestern: 1. Indiana: 0. Michigan: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Notre Dame: 3 by 22.5. Texas: 6 by 35. Oregon: 5 by 20.8. Tennessee: 2 by 8.3. Akron: 4 by 26.7. Western Michigan: 3 by 12.5. Marshall: 4 by 46.7. Michigan State: 3 by 12.5. Oregon: 3 by 22.5. Nebraska: 5 by 30.8. Penn State: 1 by 4.2. Purdue: 3 by 32.5. Northwestern: 3 by 22.5. Indiana: 1 by 4.2. Michigan: 2 by 8.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
15 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Marshall
Best efficiency game
46.7 vs Marshall
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/21 | @ Notre Dame | W 34-23 | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 1/11 | @ Texas | W 28-14 | 6 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Wed 1/1 | @ Oregon | W 41-21 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 12/22 | vs Tennessee | W 42-17 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/30 | vs Michigan | L 10-13 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/23 | vs Indiana | W 38-15 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/16 | @ Northwestern | W 31-7 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/9 | vs Purdue | W 45-0 | 3 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/2 | @ Penn State | W 20-13 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Nebraska | W 21-17 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Oregon | L 31-32 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Michigan State | W 38-7 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Marshall | W 49-14 | 4 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Western Michigan | W 56-0 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Akron | W 52-6 | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Ohio State
2021-2024
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Regular Season | Ohio State | 1 | 6.7 | 0.8 | — |
| 2022 Regular Season | Ohio State | 0 | 6.9 | 1.2 | -1 |
| 2023 Postseason | Ohio State | 10 | 20.8 | 5.7 | 10 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Ohio State | 10 | 20.8 | 5.7 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | Ohio State | 11 | 20.7 | 3.7 | 1 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Ohio State | 11 | 20.7 | 3.7 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Wisconsin
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Primary metric
2 disruption/tackle impact with 52.5 takeover score.
#2
Marshall
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 52 takeover score.
#3
Missouri
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 47.3 takeover score.
#4
Maryland
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 36.7 takeover score.
#5
Purdue
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 35.7 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2022 Regular Season · Ohio State
0 primary output · 6.9 efficiency · 1.2 usage
36.1
#2
2023 Postseason · Ohio State
27
10 primary · 20.8 efficiency · 5.7 usage
#3
2023 Regular Season · Ohio State
27
10 primary · 20.8 efficiency · 5.7 usage
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2021 · Rating 0.968
North Gwinnett · Suwanee, GA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
98
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 35 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.