Usage Score
2.4
Player Dossier
2021-2025Texas A&M
Deuce Harmon
CB • 5'10" • 190 lbs • Corinth, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Deuce Harmon shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 17.1 disruption score.
Efficiency
17.1
Consistency
12.8
Season Value
14
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Texas A&M
21222324242525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Texas A&M • SMU
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Baylor
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Deuce Harmon, CB. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Texas A&M. Deuce Harmon shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 17.1 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season
Texas A&M paired 0 primary output with 12.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 17.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Texas A&M, SMU.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Baylor
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · SMU
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
0.6
Efficiency
17.1
Usage
2.4
Consistency
12.8
Best Game by takeover score
Arizona
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arizona: 1. Unknown: 0. Baylor: 3. Missouri State: 0. TCU: 1. Syracuse: 0. Stanford: 0. Clemson: 2. Wake Forest: 1. Miami: 0. Boston College: 0. Louisville: 0. California: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arizona: 1 by 14.2. Unknown: 3 by 12.5. Baylor: 5 by 50.8. Missouri State: 1 by 4.2. TCU: 4 by 26.7. Syracuse: 1 by 4.2. Stanford: 5 by 20.8. Clemson: 1 by 24.2. Wake Forest: 3 by 22.5. Miami: 1 by 4.2. Boston College: 5 by 20.8. Louisville: 1 by 4.2. California: 3 by 12.5
Split Comparison
Wins0.4 · n=8 · -0.9 vs Losses
Losses1.3 · n=4 · +0.9 vs Wins
First Half0.7 · n=7 · +0.2 vs Second Half
Second Half0.5 · n=6 · -0.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Baylor
Best efficiency game
50.8 vs Baylor
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/3 | vs Arizona | W 24-19 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/30 | @ California | L 35-38 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Louisville | W 38-6 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Boston College | W 45-13 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/1 | vs Miami | W 26-20 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/25 | @ Wake Forest | L 12-13 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Clemson | W 35-24 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Stanford | W 34-10 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Syracuse | W 31-18 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/20 | @ TCU | L 24-35 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Missouri State | W 28-10 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Baylor | L 45-48 | 5 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 3 | — | — |
| Sun 8/31 | vs Unknown | — | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Texas A&M
2021-2023
Opening stop
- 2
SMU
2024-2025
Final stop
Season Progression
2021202220232024202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 3.5 | 16.3 | 3.5 | — |
| 2022 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 0 | 12.5 | 2.1 | -3.5 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 9 | 18.3 | 2.7 | 9 |
| 2024 Postseason | SMU | 9 | 15.9 | 2.2 | 0 |
| 2024 Regular Season | SMU | 9 | 15.9 | 2.2 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | SMU | 8 | 17.1 | 2.4 | -1 |
| 2025 Regular Season | SMU | 8 | 17.1 | 2.4 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Baylor
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 51.2 takeover score.
#2
Mississippi State
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 46.1 takeover score.
#3
South Carolina
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 45.2 takeover score.
#4
Unknown
2
Primary metric
Game with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 45 takeover score.
#5
Pittsburgh
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 44.5 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2022 Regular Season · Texas A&M
0 primary output · 12.5 efficiency · 2.1 usage
38.2
#2
2023 Regular Season · Texas A&M
29.5
9 primary · 18.3 efficiency · 2.7 usage
#3
2024 Postseason · SMU
24
9 primary · 15.9 efficiency · 2.2 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
1
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2021 · Rating 0.9183
Guyer · Denton, TX
- Committed To
- Texas A&M
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2021
Career Facts
2
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
108
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 45 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.