Usage Score
9.1
Player Dossier
2021-2025Kentucky
TE • 6'4" • 242 lbs • Bowling Green, KY, USA
Jordan Dingle reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
9.1
Efficiency
78.7
Consistency
67.8
Season Value
54.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · Kentucky
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jordan Dingle, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · Kentucky. Jordan Dingle reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason
Kentucky paired 270 primary output with 100 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 78.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Kentucky, South Carolina.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Vanderbilt
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
7
Receiving Yards / G
19.4
Efficiency
78.7
Usage
9.1
Consistency
67.8
Best Game by takeover score
Texas A&M
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 0. Vanderbilt: 43. Missouri: 20. LSU: 4. Alabama: 20. Ole Miss: 25. Texas A&M: 24
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Vanderbilt: 3 by 95.6. Missouri: 1 by 100. LSU: 1 by 26.7. Alabama: 2 by 66.7. Ole Miss: 2 by 83.3. Texas A&M: 1 by 100
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
7 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Vanderbilt
Best efficiency game
100 vs Texas A&M
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Kentucky
2021-2024
Opening stop
South Carolina
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Regular Season | Kentucky | 54 | 100 | 4.4 | — |
| 2022 Postseason | Kentucky | 220 | 68.9 | 10.5 | 166 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Kentucky | 220 | 68.9 | 10.5 | 0 |
| 2023 Postseason | Kentucky | 270 | 100 | 12.8 | 50 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Kentucky | 270 | 100 | 12.8 | 0 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Kentucky | 71 | 52.7 | 11.5 | -199 |
| 2025 Regular Season | South Carolina | 136 | 78.7 | 9.1 | 65 |
#1 Featured game
Akron
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
89
Primary metric
89 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Vanderbilt
43
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
43 receiving yards with a 95.6 efficiency score.
#3
UL Monroe
31
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
31 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Tennessee
44
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
44 receiving yards with a 73.3 efficiency score.
#5
Ohio
26
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
26 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2023 Postseason · Kentucky
270 primary output · 100 efficiency · 12.8 usage
70.8
#2
2023 Regular Season · Kentucky
70.8
270 primary · 100 efficiency · 12.8 usage
#3
2022 Postseason · Kentucky
59.8
220 primary · 68.9 efficiency · 10.5 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2021 · Rating 0.8826
Bowling Green · Bowling Green, KY
Career Facts
2
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
751
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 31 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Jordan Dingle quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit