Player Dossier

2021-2025

Minnesota

Lemeke Brockington

WR • 6'0" • 195 lbs • Moultrie, GA, USA

Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher

Lemeke Brockington reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Usage Score

21.3

Efficiency

72.9

Consistency

59.2

Season Value

62.6

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Minnesota

2122222323242425

Snapshot

Career Teams
1
Seasons Tracked
8
Program Path
Minnesota
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: California

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

Lemeke Brockington, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Minnesota. Lemeke Brockington reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Lemeke Brockington played WR for Minnesota. Across 5 tracked seasons, Lemeke Brockington recorded 10 rushing yards, 1,042 receiving yards, and 1 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Minnesota.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season

Minnesota paired 484 primary output with 72.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 72.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: California

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Regular Season · Minnesota

Games

12

Receiving Yards / G

40.3

Efficiency

72.9

Usage

21.3

Consistency

59.2

Best Game by takeover score

Wisconsin

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Buffalo: 30. Unknown: 0. California: 106. Rutgers: 41. Ohio State: 15. Purdue: 61. Nebraska: 32. Iowa: 54. Michigan State: 46. Oregon: 32. Northwestern: 43. Wisconsin: 24

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Buffalo: 2 by 100. California: 8 by 88.3. Rutgers: 5 by 54.7. Ohio State: 4 by 25. Purdue: 4 by 100. Nebraska: 2 by 100. Iowa: 6 by 60. Michigan State: 6 by 51.1. Oregon: 3 by 71.1. Northwestern: 4 by 71.7. Wisconsin: 2 by 80

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins39 · Games = 6 · -11 vs Losses
Losses50 · Games = 5 · +11 vs Wins
First Half42.2 · Games = 6 · +3.7 vs Second Half
Second Half38.5 · Games = 6 · -3.7 vs First Half

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

12 games

Featured metric

Receiving Yards

Top game by takeover score

California

Best efficiency game

100 vs Nebraska

Result
Sat 11/29vs WisconsinW 17-72241212019
Sat 11/22@ NorthwesternL 35-384438.410.80115
Sat 11/15@ OregonL 13-4233210.710.70019
Sat 11/1vs Michigan StateW 23-206467.77.70017
Sat 10/25@ IowaL 3-4165499014
Sat 10/18vs NebraskaW 24-62321616120
Sat 10/11vs PurdueW 27-2046115.315.30124
Sat 10/4@ Ohio StateL 3-424153.43.8009
Sat 9/27vs RutgersW 31-285418.28.20111
Sun 9/14@ California100 receiving yards · High volumeL 14-27810613.313.30023
Sat 9/6vs Unknown7
Fri 8/29vs BuffaloW 23-102301515015

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    Minnesota

    2021-2025

    Opening stop

Season Progression

20212022202220232023202420242025
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2021 Regular SeasonMinnesota0
2022 PostseasonMinnesota20380.811.6203
2022 Regular SeasonMinnesota20380.811.60
2023 PostseasonMinnesota738014.2-130
2023 Regular SeasonMinnesota738014.20
2024 PostseasonMinnesota28279.57.4209
2024 Regular SeasonMinnesota28279.57.40
2025 Regular SeasonMinnesota48472.921.3202

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

California

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

106

Primary metric

106 receiving yards with a 88.3 efficiency score.

#2

North Carolina

43

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

43 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#3

Wisconsin

52

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

52 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#4

Virginia Tech

55

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

55 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#5

Iowa

43

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

43 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by value score

2025 Regular Season · Minnesota

484 primary output · 72.9 efficiency · 21.3 usage

62.6

#2

2024 Postseason · Minnesota

52.3

282 primary · 79.5 efficiency · 7.4 usage

#3

2024 Regular Season · Minnesota

52.3

282 primary · 79.5 efficiency · 7.4 usage

Milestones

1

100+ receiving yards

1

8+ catch outings

0

2+ TD games

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit Profile

3★

Class 2021 · Rating 0.8759

Colquitt County · Moultrie, GA

Committed To
Minnesota
Commit Date
Jan 1, 2021

Career Facts

1

Career teams

8

Seasons tracked

1,042

Career Receiving Yards

Data Context

Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 36 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.