Player Stats

Alijah Clark College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
172
TFL
9.5
QB hurries
3
Passes defended
9

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2021 Regular SeasonRutgers33-0--013.1
2022 Regular SeasonSyracuse11482.50-2028.9
2023 PostseasonSyracuse121-0--043.4
2023 Regular SeasonSyracuse12613.5023043.4
2024 PostseasonSyracuse1260.50--058.2
2024 Regular SeasonSyracuse12533014058.2

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason

Syracuse paired 9.5 primary output with 28.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

2024 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 28.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Rutgers, Syracuse.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Pittsburgh

Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2024 Postseason · Syracuse

Games

12

Havoc Plays / G

0.8

Efficiency

28.4

Usage

6.7

Consistency

48.2

Best Game by takeover score

Pittsburgh

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Washington State: 1.5. Ohio: 0. Georgia Tech: 1. Stanford: 1. Holy Cross: 0. UNLV: 0.5. NC State: 0. Pittsburgh: 3. Virginia Tech: 0. Boston College: 1. California: 0.5. Miami: 1

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Washington State: 6 by 40. Ohio: 9 by 37.5. Georgia Tech: 5 by 30.8. Stanford: 6 by 35. Holy Cross: 1 by 4.2. UNLV: 6 by 30. NC State: 4 by 16.7. Pittsburgh: 4 by 46.7. Virginia Tech: 4 by 16.7. Boston College: 9 by 47.5. California: 4 by 21.7. Miami: 1 by 14.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.5 · Games = 9 · -1.2 vs Losses
Losses1.7 · Games = 3 · +1.2 vs Wins