Player Stats

Caleb Hood College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
709
Rushing yards
515
Receiving yards
194
Touchdowns
5

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2021 PostseasonNorth Carolina6000028.9
2021 Regular SeasonNorth Carolina697970128.9
2022 Regular SeasonNorth Carolina7369250119154.7
2023 Regular SeasonNorth Carolina552439116.9
2024 PostseasonNorth Carolina586788126.5
2024 Regular SeasonNorth Carolina532329026.5
2025 Regular SeasonNorth Carolina5734429119.7

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season

North Carolina paired 369 primary output with 43.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 17.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2025 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: TCU

Loss with 46 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Regular Season · North Carolina

Games

5

Scrimmage Yards / G

14.6

Efficiency

17.7

Usage

9.9

Consistency

13.3

Best Game by takeover score

TCU

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. TCU: 46. Charlotte: 29. UCF: 0. Clemson: -2. California: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. TCU: 11 by 36.8. Charlotte: 8 by 33.9. UCF: 2 by 0. Clemson: 1 by 0

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins29 · Games = 1 · +18 vs Losses
Losses11 · Games = 4 · -18 vs Wins