Player Stats

Tavierre Dunlap College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
684
Rushing yards
566
Receiving yards
118
Touchdowns
6

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2021 Regular SeasonMichigan251510037.7
2022 Regular SeasonMichigan651465033.8
2023 Regular SeasonMichigan221210035.5
2024 Regular SeasonMichigan120200152.1
2025 Regular SeasonEastern Michigan11541428113569.3

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season

Eastern Michigan paired 541 primary output with 46.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 46.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Michigan, Eastern Michigan.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Buffalo

Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Regular Season · Eastern Michigan

Games

11

Scrimmage Yards / G

49.2

Efficiency

46.8

Usage

21.1

Consistency

70.2

Best Game by takeover score

Buffalo

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Texas State: 33. Long Island University: 23. Kentucky: 54. Louisiana: 68. Central Michigan: 39. Buffalo: 102. Miami (OH): 50. Ohio: 37. Bowling Green: 61. Ball State: 50. Western Michigan: 24

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas State: 10 by 34.4. Long Island University: 12 by 22.8. Kentucky: 6 by 56.3. Louisiana: 14 by 45.8. Central Michigan: 9 by 44.6. Buffalo: 28 by 36.6. Miami (OH): 6 by 84.7. Ohio: 8 by 48.7. Bowling Green: 14 by 44.9. Ball State: 9 by 63. Western Michigan: 10 by 32.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins59.7 · Games = 3 · +14.4 vs Losses
Losses45.3 · Games = 8 · -14.4 vs Wins