Player Stats

Michael Trigg College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
1,419
Receptions
108
Touchdowns
14

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2021 Regular SeasonUSC47109141.8
2022 Regular SeasonOle Miss617156355.1
2023 Regular SeasonOle Miss2465151.6
2024 Regular SeasonBaylor930395366.5
2025 Regular SeasonBaylor1150694675.8

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season

Baylor paired 694 primary output with 82 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 82 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across USC, Ole Miss, Baylor.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Kansas State

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Regular Season · Baylor

Games

11

Receiving Yards / G

63.1

Efficiency

82

Usage

17.9

Consistency

61.5

Best Game by takeover score

Kansas State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Auburn: 99. SMU: 38. Samford: 14. Arizona State: 71. Oklahoma State: 62. Kansas State: 155. TCU: 56. Cincinnati: 30. UCF: 82. Utah: 42. Arizona: 45

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Auburn: 7 by 94.3. SMU: 4 by 63.3. Samford: 2 by 46.7. Arizona State: 5 by 94.7. Oklahoma State: 3 by 100. Kansas State: 8 by 100. TCU: 3 by 100. Cincinnati: 3 by 66.7. UCF: 5 by 100. Utah: 3 by 93.3. Arizona: 7 by 42.9

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins70.2 · Games = 5 · +13.0 vs Losses
Losses57.2 · Games = 6 · -13.0 vs Wins