Player Stats

Donnie Gray College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
302
Receptions
31

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2021 Regular SeasonNorthwestern0-00-
2022 Regular SeasonNorthwestern1118056.7
2023 Regular SeasonNorthwestern114035.6
2024 Regular SeasonNorthwestern2220039.8
2025 Regular SeasonMassachusetts1127260063.7

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season

Massachusetts paired 260 primary output with 55.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 55.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Northwestern, Massachusetts.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Kent State

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Regular Season · Massachusetts

Games

11

Receiving Yards / G

23.6

Efficiency

55.4

Usage

12.8

Consistency

56.6

Best Game by takeover score

Kent State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Temple: 5. Bryant: 55. Iowa: 27. Missouri: 28. Western Michigan: 8. Kent State: 60. Buffalo: 2. Central Michigan: 7. Akron: 3. Northern Illinois: 41. Bowling Green: 24

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Temple: 1 by 33.3. Bryant: 2 by 100. Iowa: 2 by 90. Missouri: 2 by 93.3. Western Michigan: 1 by 53.3. Kent State: 6 by 66.7. Buffalo: 1 by 13.3. Central Michigan: 1 by 46.7. Akron: 1 by 20. Northern Illinois: 7 by 39. Bowling Green: 3 by 53.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

First Half30.5 · Games = 6 · +15.1 vs Second Half
Second Half15.4 · Games = 5 · -15.1 vs First Half