Player Stats

Brady Boyd College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
919
Receptions
66
Touchdowns
9

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2021 Regular SeasonMinnesota2218040.9
2022 PostseasonTexas Tech819044.1
2022 Regular SeasonTexas Tech811101144.1
2023 PostseasonTexas Tech2337036.4
2023 Regular SeasonTexas Tech224036.4
2024 Regular SeasonTexas Tech117040.4
2025 PostseasonUtah State13499178.2
2025 Regular SeasonUtah State1342644778.2

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason

Utah State paired 743 primary output with 86.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 86.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across Minnesota, Texas Tech, Utah State.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Washington State

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 92.3th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Postseason · Utah State

Games

13

Receiving Yards / G

57.2

Efficiency

86.4

Usage

19.8

Consistency

60.7

Best Game by takeover score

Washington State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Washington State: 99. UTEP: 31. Texas A&M: 87. Air Force: 72. McNeese: 84. Vanderbilt: 14. Hawai'i: 68. San José State: 48. New Mexico: 27. Nevada: 117. UNLV: 39. Fresno State: 42. Boise State: 15

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Washington State: 4 by 100. UTEP: 3 by 68.9. Texas A&M: 6 by 96.7. Air Force: 4 by 100. McNeese: 4 by 100. Vanderbilt: 2 by 46.7. Hawai'i: 5 by 90.7. San José State: 3 by 100. New Mexico: 2 by 90. Nevada: 5 by 100. UNLV: 3 by 86.7. Fresno State: 3 by 93.3. Boise State: 2 by 50

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins65.7 · Games = 6 · +15.8 vs Losses
Losses49.9 · Games = 7 · -15.8 vs Wins