Player Stats

Thomas Zsiros College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
396
Receptions
27
Touchdowns
3

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2021 PostseasonToledo319051.2
2021 Regular SeasonToledo3235051.2
2022 PostseasonToledo1116058.8
2022 Regular SeasonToledo119192258.8
2023 PostseasonToledo213035.8
2023 Regular SeasonToledo213035.8
2024 Regular SeasonToledo712148159.6
2025 Regular SeasonToledo0-00-

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season

Toledo paired 148 primary output with 71.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2024 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 71.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2025 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Miami (OH)

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2024 Regular Season · Toledo

Games

7

Receiving Yards / G

21.1

Efficiency

71.3

Usage

8.5

Consistency

64.1

Best Game by takeover score

Miami (OH)

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Duquesne: 21. Miami (OH): 43. Buffalo: 6. Bowling Green: 9. Eastern Michigan: 38. Central Michigan: 22. Ohio: 9

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Duquesne: 2 by 70. Miami (OH): 3 by 95.6. Buffalo: 1 by 40. Bowling Green: 1 by 60. Eastern Michigan: 2 by 100. Central Michigan: 2 by 73.3. Ohio: 1 by 60

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins31 · Games = 4 · +23 vs Losses
Losses8 · Games = 3 · -23 vs Wins