Player Stats

Aaron Dumas College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
658
Rushing yards
658
Touchdowns
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2021 Regular SeasonNew Mexico116586580272.6
2022 Regular SeasonWashington00000-
2023 Regular SeasonUTEP00000-

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season

New Mexico paired 658 primary output with 49.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

2021 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 49.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across New Mexico, Washington, UTEP.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Fresno State

Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2021 Regular Season · New Mexico

Games

11

Scrimmage Yards / G

59.8

Efficiency

49.7

Usage

25.7

Consistency

67.4

Best Game by takeover score

Fresno State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Houston Christian: 57. New Mexico State: 58. Texas A&M: 49. UTEP: 28. Air Force: 15. San Diego State: 77. Colorado State: 68. Wyoming: 35. UNLV: 92. Fresno State: 143. Boise State: 36

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Houston Christian: 15 by 39.6. New Mexico State: 10 by 60.4. Texas A&M: 10 by 51. UTEP: 8 by 36.5. Air Force: 3 by 52.1. San Diego State: 11 by 72.9. Colorado State: 14 by 50.6. Wyoming: 12 by 30.4. UNLV: 15 by 63.9. Fresno State: 23 by 64.8. Boise State: 15 by 25

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins50 · Games = 3 · -13.5 vs Losses
Losses63.5 · Games = 8 · +13.5 vs Wins