Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason
Georgia Tech paired 309 primary output with 70.9 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Regular Season | Alabama | 2 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 24.7 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Alabama | 2 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 26.1 |
| 2023 Postseason | Georgia Tech | 12 | - | 0 | 0 | 67.3 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Georgia Tech | 12 | 25 | 309 | 2 | 67.3 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Georgia Tech | 3 | 3 | 27 | 0 | 24.2 |
| 2025 Postseason | Western Michigan | 14 | - | 0 | 0 | 41.7 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Western Michigan | 14 | 15 | 115 | 0 | 41.7 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason
Georgia Tech paired 309 primary output with 70.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 49.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across Alabama, Georgia Tech, Western Michigan.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Northern Illinois
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 62.5th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
14
Receiving Yards / G
8.2
Efficiency
49.2
Usage
14.4
Consistency
32.5
Best Game by takeover score
Northern Illinois
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Kennesaw State: 0. Michigan State: 0. North Texas: 0. Illinois: 5. Toledo: 23. Rhode Island: 17. Massachusetts: 18. Ball State: 13. Miami (OH): 4. Central Michigan: 18. Ohio: 0. Northern Illinois: 17. Eastern Michigan: 0. Miami (OH): 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Illinois: 1 by 33.3. Toledo: 2 by 76.7. Rhode Island: 2 by 56.7. Massachusetts: 3 by 40. Ball State: 2 by 43.3. Miami (OH): 1 by 26.7. Central Michigan: 2 by 60. Northern Illinois: 2 by 56.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.