Usage Score
8.5
Player Dossier
2021-2023LSU
Mekhi Wingo
DT • 6'1" • 295 lbs • Saint Louis, MO, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Mekhi Wingo shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 24.9 disruption score.
Efficiency
24.9
Consistency
37.7
Season Value
23.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · LSU
2121222323
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Missouri • LSU
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Ole Miss
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Mekhi Wingo, DT. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · LSU. Mekhi Wingo shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 24.9 disruption score.
Mekhi Wingo played DT for Missouri and LSU. Across 3 tracked seasons, Mekhi Wingo recorded 92 tackles and 2 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2022 with LSU.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason
LSU paired 9.5 primary output with 24.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 24.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Missouri, LSU.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Wisconsin
Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2023 Postseason · LSU
Games
8
Havoc Plays / G
1.2
Efficiency
24.9
Usage
8.5
Consistency
37.7
Best Game by takeover score
Wisconsin
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Wisconsin: 4. Florida State: 0. Unknown: 0.5. Mississippi State: 2. Arkansas: 1. Ole Miss: 0. Missouri: 0. Auburn: 2
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wisconsin: 3 by 52.5. Florida State: 4 by 16.7. Unknown: 3 by 17.5. Mississippi State: 3 by 32.5. Arkansas: 4 by 26.7. Ole Miss: 3 by 12.5. Missouri: 3 by 12.5. Auburn: 2 by 28.3
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins1.8 · Games = 5 · +1.8 vs Losses
Losses0 · Games = 2 · -1.8 vs Wins
First Half1.6 · Games = 4 · +0.9 vs Second Half
Second Half0.8 · Games = 4 · -0.9 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Wisconsin
Best efficiency game
52.5 vs Wisconsin
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 1/1 | vs Wisconsin2+ sacks · Splash game | W 35-31 | 3 | 2 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/14 | vs Auburn | W 48-18 | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/7 | @ Missouri | W 49-39 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/30 | @ Ole Miss | L 49-55 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | vs Arkansas | W 34-31 | 4 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | @ Mississippi State | W 41-14 | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Unknown | — | 3 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/3 | @ Florida State | L 24-45 | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Missouri
2021
Opening stop
- 2
LSU
2022-2023
Final stop
Season Progression
20212021202220232023
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Postseason | Missouri | 4 | 16.9 | 3.6 | — |
| 2021 Regular Season | Missouri | 4 | 16.9 | 3.6 | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | LSU | 10 | 22.2 | 5.4 | 6 |
| 2023 Postseason | LSU | 9.5 | 24.9 | 8.5 | -0.5 |
| 2023 Regular Season | LSU | 9.5 | 24.9 | 8.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Ole Miss
Win with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
5
Primary metric
5 disruption/tackle impact with 67 takeover score.
#2
Wisconsin
4
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 57.1 takeover score.
#3
North Texas
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 49.2 takeover score.
#4
Central Michigan
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 44.7 takeover score.
#5
Mississippi State
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 31.6 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2023 Postseason · LSU
9.5 primary output · 24.9 efficiency · 8.5 usage
23.6
#2
2023 Regular Season · LSU
23.6
9.5 primary · 24.9 efficiency · 8.5 usage
#3
2022 Regular Season · LSU
15.8
10 primary · 22.2 efficiency · 5.4 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
2
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2026 · Rating 0.8578
Centennial · Corona, CA
- Committed To
- California
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2026
Career Facts
2
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
92
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 29 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.