Usage Score
42.9
Player Dossier
2020-2022Air Force
Kyle Patterson
TE • 6'6" • 250 lbs • Gilbert, AZ, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Kyle Patterson reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
71.1
Consistency
100
Season Value
57.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season · Air Force
202122
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Program Path
- Air Force
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Army
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kyle Patterson, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season · Air Force. Kyle Patterson reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season
Air Force paired 205 primary output with 92.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 71.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Wyoming
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Regular Season · Air Force
Games
1
Receiving Yards / G
32
Efficiency
71.1
Usage
42.9
Consistency
100
Best Game by takeover score
Wyoming
Not enough games exist for the full explorer. The summary cards stay available so the season still reads clearly.
Game-by-Game Trend
Not enough games are available for a full trend line yet.
Volume vs Efficiency
Scatter view is hidden because this season does not have enough game-to-game variety yet.
Split Comparison
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
1 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Wyoming
Best efficiency game
71.1 vs Wyoming
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 9/17 | @ Wyoming | L 14-17 | — | 3 | 32 | 10.7 | 10.70 | 0 | 11 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Air Force
2020-2022
Opening stop
Season Progression
202020212022
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Regular Season | Air Force | 205 | 92.9 | 46.7 | — |
| 2021 Regular Season | Air Force | 81 | 86.7 | 41.7 | -124 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Air Force | 32 | 71.1 | 42.9 | -49 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Army
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
65
Primary metric
65 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
San José State
56
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
56 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Boise State
38
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
38 receiving yards with a 84.4 efficiency score.
#4
Utah State
59
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
59 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Wyoming
32
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
32 receiving yards with a 71.1 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2020 Regular Season · Air Force
205 primary output · 92.9 efficiency · 46.7 usage
78.5
#2
2021 Regular Season · Air Force
58.8
81 primary · 86.7 efficiency · 41.7 usage
#3
2022 Regular Season · Air Force
57.3
32 primary · 71.1 efficiency · 42.9 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2019 · Rating 0.8317
Perry · Gilbert, AZ
- Committed To
- Air Force
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2019
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
318
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 8 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.