Player Stats

Abdul-Fatai Ibrahim College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
341
Receptions
34
Touchdowns
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2023 PostseasonBowling Green1217065.4
2023 Regular SeasonBowling Green1219213265.4
2024 PostseasonLouisiana Tech9227050.8
2024 Regular SeasonLouisiana Tech91294050.8

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason

Bowling Green paired 220 primary output with 64.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2024 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 57 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Bowling Green, Louisiana Tech.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Army

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2024 Postseason · Louisiana Tech

Games

9

Receiving Yards / G

13.4

Efficiency

57

Usage

9.5

Consistency

59.5

Best Game by takeover score

Army

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Army: 27. Nicholls: 5. Florida International: 17. Middle Tennessee: 0. UTEP: 5. Sam Houston: 22. Jacksonville State: 0. Arkansas: 26. Kennesaw State: 19

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Army: 2 by 90. Nicholls: 1 by 33.3. Florida International: 2 by 56.7. UTEP: 2 by 16.7. Sam Houston: 2 by 73.3. Arkansas: 2 by 86.7. Kennesaw State: 3 by 42.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins7.3 · Games = 4 · -11.1 vs Losses
Losses18.4 · Games = 5 · +11.1 vs Wins