Player Stats

Tariq Speights College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
175
TFL
4.5
Sacks
1
QB hurries
4
Passes defended
3

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2018 Regular SeasonEastern Michigan00-0--0-
2019 Regular SeasonEastern Michigan613-0--039.7
2020 Regular SeasonEastern Michigan6522.501-063.3
2021 PostseasonEastern Michigan135-0--046.3
2021 Regular SeasonEastern Michigan13841.5112046.3
2022 Regular SeasonEastern Michigan8210.5021029.9

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season

Eastern Michigan paired 3.5 primary output with 41.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2022 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 15.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2022 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Buffalo

Loss with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2022 Regular Season · Eastern Michigan

Games

8

Havoc Plays / G

0.4

Efficiency

15.3

Usage

3.4

Consistency

12.5

Best Game by takeover score

Buffalo

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Eastern Kentucky: 0. Louisiana: 0. Arizona State: 0. Buffalo: 1.5. Massachusetts: 1. Northern Illinois: 0. Ball State: 1. Central Michigan: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Eastern Kentucky: 1 by 4.2. Louisiana: 2 by 8.3. Arizona State: 3 by 12.5. Buffalo: 7 by 44.2. Massachusetts: 2 by 18.3. Northern Illinois: 1 by 4.2. Ball State: 2 by 18.3. Central Michigan: 3 by 12.5

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.4 · Games = 5 · -0.1 vs Losses
Losses0.5 · Games = 3 · +0.1 vs Wins