Usage / Role
1%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2019-2022Army
WR • 6'1" • 200 lbs • Plantation, FL, USA
Cole Caterbone reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage / Role
1%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
8
Developing production for a receiver
Reliability
15
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
15
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2021 Regular Season · Army
Snapshot
Cole Caterbone, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2021 Regular Season · Army. Cole Caterbone reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | Army | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2020 Postseason | Army | 2 | 2 | 19 | 0 | 75.6 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Army | 2 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 75.6 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Army | 4 | 5 | 45 | 0 | 76.3 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Army | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 47 |
Related Context
Cole Caterbone played WR for Army. Across 4 tracked seasons, Cole Caterbone recorded 81 receiving yards and 2 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2021 with Army.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season
Army paired 45 primary output with 57.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 46.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2022 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTSA
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
1
Receiving Yards / G
7
Efficiency
46.7
Usage
7.7
Consistency
100
Best Game by takeover score
UTSA
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
1 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UTSA
Best efficiency game
46.7 vs UTSA
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 9/10 | vs UTSA | L 38-41 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Army
2019-2022
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | Army | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2020 Postseason | Army | 29 | 65 | 50 | 29 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Army | 29 | 65 | 50 | 0 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Army | 45 | 57.8 | 27 | 16 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Army | 7 | 46.7 | 7.7 | -38 |
#1 Featured game
vs Navy
Week 15 · L 13-17
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
23
Receiving Yards
90.7 takeover
23 receiving yards with a 76.7 efficiency score.
#2
vs West Virginia
Week 1 · L 21-24 · Postseason
19
Receiving Yards
87.8 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
19 receiving yards with a 63.3 efficiency score.
#3
vs Mercer
Week 8 · W 49-3
10
Receiving Yards
73.1 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
10 receiving yards with a 66.7 efficiency score.
#4
vs Western Kentucky
Week 2 · W 38-35
15
Receiving Yards
71.7 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
15 receiving yards with a 50 efficiency score.
#5
vs UTSA
Week 2 · L 38-41
7
Receiving Yards
57.5 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
7 receiving yards with a 46.7 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2021 Regular Season · Army
45 primary output · 57.8 efficiency · 27 usage
76.3
#2
2020 Postseason · Army
75.6
29 primary · 65 efficiency · 50 usage
#3
2020 Regular Season · Army
75.6
29 primary · 65 efficiency · 50 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.