Player Stats

Aaron Beckwith College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
48
QB hurries
1
Passes defended
1

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2020 Regular SeasonMassachusetts10-01-060.4
2021 Regular SeasonMassachusetts12-0--040
2022 Regular SeasonMassachusetts46-0--038.8
2023 Regular SeasonMassachusetts920-0-1031.9
2024 Regular SeasonMassachusetts612-0--040.9
2025 Regular SeasonTemple48-0--040.2

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season

Massachusetts paired 1 primary output with 10 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 8.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Massachusetts, Temple.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Army

Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Regular Season · Temple

Games

4

Havoc Plays / G

0

Efficiency

8.4

Usage

1.5

Consistency

100

Best Game by takeover score

Army

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Massachusetts: 0. Georgia Tech: 0. Tulsa: 0. Army: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Massachusetts: 2 by 8.3. Georgia Tech: 1 by 4.2. Tulsa: 1 by 4.2. Army: 4 by 16.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0 · Games = 2 · +0 vs Losses
Losses0 · Games = 2 · +0 vs Wins