Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason
Bowling Green paired 17 primary output with 32.9 efficiency.
Player Stats
Charles Rosser College Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Career production snapshot
- Tackles
- 101
- TFL
- 9.5
- Sacks
- 5
- QB hurries
- 4
- Touchdowns
- 2
Season Ledger
Crawlable season-by-season stats
| Season | Team | Games | Tackles | TFL | Sacks | QB Hur | PD | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
| 2021 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 7 | 12 | 1.5 | 0 | - | - | 0 | 11.7 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 8 | 7 | - | 0 | - | - | 2 | 36.3 |
| 2023 Postseason | Bowling Green | 9 | 5 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | 41.3 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 9 | 15 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | 41.3 |
| 2024 Postseason | Bowling Green | 13 | 4 | 0.5 | 0.5 | - | - | 0 | 69.3 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 13 | 58 | 7.5 | 4.5 | 4 | - | 0 | 69.3 |
Player insights
Supporting note
2024 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 32.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Old Dominion
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2024 Postseason · Bowling Green
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
1.3
Efficiency
32.9
Usage
10.5
Consistency
56.5
Best Game by takeover score
Old Dominion
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arkansas State: 1. Fordham: 2. Penn State: 2. Texas A&M: 1. Old Dominion: 2. Akron: 2. Northern Illinois: 0.5. Kent State: 2. Toledo: 0. Central Michigan: 1. Western Michigan: 2. Ball State: 1. Miami (OH): 0.5
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arkansas State: 4 by 26.7. Fordham: 5 by 40.8. Penn State: 7 by 49.2. Texas A&M: 2 by 18.3. Old Dominion: 8 by 53.3. Akron: 4 by 36.7. Northern Illinois: 9 by 42.5. Kent State: 3 by 32.5. Toledo: 2 by 8.3. Central Michigan: 5 by 30.8. Western Michigan: 4 by 36.7. Ball State: 4 by 26.7. Miami (OH): 5 by 25.8
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins1.4 · Games = 7 · +0.3 vs Losses
Losses1.2 · Games = 6 · -0.3 vs Wins
Next best actions
Keep exploring Charles Rosser
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.