Player Stats

Kobe Wilson College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
302
TFL
20
Sacks
6.5
QB hurries
10
Passes defended
6
Touchdowns
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2020 Regular SeasonTemple51320-2022.4
2021 Regular SeasonTemple1150411-032.5
2022 Regular SeasonTemple12645.51.512046
2023 PostseasonSMU136-0--052.7
2023 Regular SeasonSMU13673141052.7
2024 PostseasonSMU137-0--062.8
2024 Regular SeasonSMU13955.5341262.8

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason

SMU paired 15.5 primary output with 43.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2024 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 43.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Temple, SMU.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: California

Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2024 Postseason · SMU

Games

13

Havoc Plays / G

1.2

Efficiency

43.3

Usage

9.4

Consistency

29.4

Best Game by takeover score

California

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Penn State: 0. Houston Christian: 0.5. Nevada: 0. BYU: 2.5. TCU: 0. Florida State: 3. Louisville: 1. Stanford: 0. Duke: 1. Pittsburgh: 0. Boston College: 3. Virginia: 0. California: 4.5

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Penn State: 7 by 29.2. Houston Christian: 6 by 30. Nevada: 7 by 29.2. BYU: 5 by 45.8. TCU: 6 by 25. Florida State: 7 by 59.2. Louisville: 10 by 51.7. Stanford: 4 by 16.7. Duke: 7 by 39.2. Pittsburgh: 11 by 45.8. Boston College: 16 by 80. Virginia: 9 by 37.5. California: 7 by 74.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1.2 · Games = 11 · -0.1 vs Losses
Losses1.3 · Games = 2 · +0.1 vs Wins