Player Stats

Jacob Cowing College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
4,460
Receptions
314
Touchdowns
34

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2019 Regular SeasonUTEP1131550360.7
2020 Regular SeasonUTEP841691380
2021 PostseasonUTEP13224089.3
2021 Regular SeasonUTEP13671,330889.3
2022 Regular SeasonArizona12841,026778.2
2023 PostseasonArizona137152264.6
2023 Regular SeasonArizona13826871164.6

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason

UTEP paired 1,354 primary output with 89.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2023 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 55.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across UTEP, Arizona.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Arizona State

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2023 Postseason · Arizona

Games

13

Receiving Yards / G

64.5

Efficiency

55.8

Usage

27

Consistency

50.5

Best Game by takeover score

Arizona State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma: 152. Northern Arizona: 38. Mississippi State: 31. UTEP: 84. Stanford: 85. Washington: 61. USC: 88. Washington State: 29. Oregon State: 36. UCLA: 49. Colorado: 24. Utah: 5. Arizona State: 157

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma: 7 by 100. Northern Arizona: 3 by 84.4. Mississippi State: 7 by 29.5. UTEP: 10 by 56. Stanford: 8 by 70.8. Washington: 8 by 50.8. USC: 10 by 58.7. Washington State: 8 by 24.2. Oregon State: 6 by 40. UCLA: 8 by 40.8. Colorado: 3 by 53.3. Utah: 2 by 16.7. Arizona State: 9 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins65.9 · Games = 10 · +5.9 vs Losses
Losses60 · Games = 3 · -5.9 vs Wins