Usage Score
10.4
Player Dossier
2019-2023Middle Tennessee
WR • 5'8" • 152 lbs • Moncks Corner, SC, USA
DJ England-Chisolm reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
10.4
Efficiency
64.5
Consistency
57.5
Season Value
56.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Middle Tennessee
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
DJ England-Chisolm, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Middle Tennessee. DJ England-Chisolm reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
DJ England-Chisolm played WR for Middle Tennessee. Across 5 tracked seasons, DJ England-Chisolm recorded 109 rushing yards, 1,342 receiving yards, and 7 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2022 with Middle Tennessee.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season
Middle Tennessee paired 347 primary output with 64.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 64.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Florida International
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
31.5
Efficiency
64.5
Usage
10.4
Consistency
57.5
Best Game by takeover score
Sam Houston
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Alabama: 16. Missouri: 1. Unknown: 55. Western Kentucky: 20. Jacksonville State: 11. Louisiana Tech: 14. Liberty: 41. New Mexico State: 27. Florida International: 76. UTEP: 38. Sam Houston: 48
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Alabama: 3 by 35.6. Missouri: 1 by 6.7. Unknown: 3 by 100. Western Kentucky: 3 by 44.4. Jacksonville State: 2 by 36.7. Louisiana Tech: 2 by 46.7. Liberty: 3 by 91.1. New Mexico State: 1 by 100. Florida International: 2 by 100. UTEP: 3 by 84.4. Sam Houston: 5 by 64
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Florida International
Best efficiency game
100 vs Florida International
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/25 | @ Sam Houston | L 20-23 | — | 5 | 48 | 9.6 | 9.60 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 11/18 | vs UTEP | W 34-30 | — | 3 | 38 | 12.7 | 12.70 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 11/11 | vs Florida International | W 40-6 | — | 2 | 76 | 38 | 38 | 1 | 72 |
| Sat 11/4 | @ New Mexico State | L 7-13 | — | 1 | 27 | 27 | 27 | 1 | 27 |
| Tue 10/17 | @ Liberty | L 35-42 | — | 3 | 41 | 13.7 | 13.70 | 1 | 36 |
| Tue 10/10 | vs Louisiana Tech | W 31-23 | — | 2 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 8 |
| Thu 10/5 | vs Jacksonville State | L 30-45 | — | 2 | 11 | 5.5 | 5.50 | 0 | 9 |
| Thu 9/28 | @ Western Kentucky | L 10-31 | — | 3 | 20 | 6.7 | 6.70 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 9/16 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 55 | 18.3 | 18.30 | 0 | 30 |
| Sat 9/9 | @ Missouri | L 19-23 | — | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Sat 9/2 | @ Alabama | L 7-56 | — | 3 | 16 | 5.3 | 5.30 | 0 | 8 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Middle Tennessee
2019-2023
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 162 | 78.7 | 5.7 | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 172 | 58.6 | 8.9 | 10 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 295 | 53.6 | 10.4 | 123 |
| 2022 Postseason | Middle Tennessee | 366 | 65.4 | 11.3 | 71 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 366 | 65.4 | 11.3 | 0 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 347 | 64.5 | 10.4 | -19 |
#1 Featured game
UTSA
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
85
Primary metric
85 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Miami
169
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
169 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Western Kentucky
69
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
69 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Florida International
76
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
76 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Charlotte
67
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
67 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2023 Regular Season · Middle Tennessee
347 primary output · 64.5 efficiency · 10.4 usage
56.1
#2
2022 Postseason · Middle Tennessee
52.2
366 primary · 65.4 efficiency · 11.3 usage
#3
2022 Regular Season · Middle Tennessee
52.2
366 primary · 65.4 efficiency · 11.3 usage
1
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2019 · Rating 0.8017
Berkeley · Moncks Corner, SC
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,342
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 46 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.