Player Stats

Chris Conti College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
119
TFL
6.5
Sacks
1.5
QB hurries
4
Passes defended
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2019 Regular SeasonRutgers12-0--040.3
2020 Regular SeasonRutgers23-0--038.5
2021 Regular SeasonRutgers00-0--0-
2022 Regular SeasonRice12694132058.3
2023 Regular SeasonRice7452.50.51-054.3
2024 Regular SeasonRice00-0--0-

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season

Rice paired 10 primary output with 32.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2023 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 33.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2024 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Rutgers, Rice.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: South Florida

Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2023 Regular Season · Rice

Games

7

Havoc Plays / G

0.7

Efficiency

33.9

Usage

9.6

Consistency

53.1

Best Game by takeover score

South Florida

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Texas Southern: 0. South Florida: 2. East Carolina: 1. UConn: 1. Tulsa: 1. Tulane: 0. Charlotte: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas Southern: 1 by 4.2. South Florida: 11 by 65.8. East Carolina: 7 by 39.2. UConn: 9 by 47.5. Tulsa: 8 by 43.3. Tulane: 8 by 33.3. Charlotte: 1 by 4.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.5 · Games = 4 · -0.5 vs Losses
Losses1 · Games = 3 · +0.5 vs Wins