Player Stats

Rich Miller College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
236
TFL
11.5
Sacks
5
QB hurries
1
Passes defended
4

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2019 Regular SeasonBuffalo89-0--037.7
2020 PostseasonBuffalo61-0--011.4
2020 Regular SeasonBuffalo61210--011.4
2021 Regular SeasonKansas127952-2062.2
2022 Regular SeasonKansas1283311-046
2023 PostseasonKansas122-0--039.9
2023 Regular SeasonKansas12502.52-2039.9

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season

Kansas paired 9 primary output with 34.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

2023 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 23.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Buffalo, Kansas.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Texas Tech

Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2023 Postseason · Kansas

Games

12

Havoc Plays / G

0.5

Efficiency

23.5

Usage

6

Consistency

13.9

Best Game by takeover score

Texas Tech

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. UNLV: 0. Missouri State: 0. Illinois: 0. BYU: 0. Texas: 0. UCF: 0.5. Oklahoma State: 0. Oklahoma: 0. Iowa State: 2. Texas Tech: 2. Kansas State: 1. Cincinnati: 1

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UNLV: 2 by 8.3. Missouri State: 7 by 29.2. Illinois: 2 by 8.3. BYU: 4 by 16.7. Texas: 3 by 12.5. UCF: 5 by 25.8. Oklahoma State: 5 by 20.8. Oklahoma: 3 by 12.5. Iowa State: 8 by 53.3. Texas Tech: 8 by 53.3. Kansas State: 3 by 22.5. Cincinnati: 2 by 18.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.4 · Games = 8 · -0.3 vs Losses
Losses0.8 · Games = 4 · +0.3 vs Wins