Player Stats

Marcus Washington College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
1,013
Receptions
64
Touchdowns
4

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2019 Regular SeasonTexas3333041.5
2020 Regular SeasonTexas2456143.2
2021 Regular SeasonTexas718277252.9
2021 Regular SeasonNebraska7-0052.9
2022 Regular SeasonNebraska1231471169.6
2023 Regular SeasonNebraska58176063.2

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season

Nebraska paired 471 primary output with 79.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2023 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 91.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2023 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Texas, Nebraska.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Michigan

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2023 Regular Season · Nebraska

Games

5

Receiving Yards / G

35.2

Efficiency

91.1

Usage

13.2

Consistency

80.2

Best Game by takeover score

Michigan

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Minnesota: 31. Colorado: 13. Northern Illinois: 37. Michigan: 56. Illinois: 39

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Minnesota: 3 by 68.9. Colorado: 1 by 86.7. Northern Illinois: 2 by 100. Michigan: 1 by 100. Illinois: 1 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins38 · Games = 2 · +4.7 vs Losses
Losses33.3 · Games = 3 · -4.7 vs Wins