Player Stats

George Johnson III College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
908
Receptions
73
Touchdowns
4

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2019 Regular SeasonMichigan0-00-
2020 Regular SeasonMichigan0-00-
2021 Regular SeasonMichigan1-00100
2022 Regular SeasonMassachusetts1128402183.6
2023 Regular SeasonMassachusetts1235421379.7
2024 Regular SeasonFlorida Atlantic61085037.8

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season

Michigan paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.

Supporting note

2024 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 53 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2024 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across Michigan, Massachusetts, Florida Atlantic.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2024 Regular Season · Florida Atlantic

Games

6

Receiving Yards / G

14.2

Efficiency

53

Usage

9.4

Consistency

46.9

Best Game by takeover score

Tulsa

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Michigan State: 5. Army: 24. Florida International: 6. East Carolina: 12. Charlotte: 6. Tulsa: 32

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Michigan State: 1 by 33.3. Army: 3 by 53.3. Florida International: 1 by 40. East Carolina: 1 by 80. Charlotte: 1 by 40. Tulsa: 3 by 71.1

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins19 · Games = 2 · +7.3 vs Losses
Losses11.8 · Games = 4 · -7.3 vs Wins