Usage Score
9.4
Player Dossier
2019-2024Michigan
WR • 6'0" • 185 lbs • Stuart, FL, USA
George Johnson III reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
9.4
Efficiency
53
Consistency
46.9
Season Value
32.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season · Michigan
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
George Johnson III, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season · Michigan. George Johnson III reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season
Michigan paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 53 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2024 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across Michigan, Massachusetts, Florida Atlantic.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
6
Receiving Yards / G
14.2
Efficiency
53
Usage
9.4
Consistency
46.9
Best Game by takeover score
Tulsa
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Michigan State: 5. Army: 24. Florida International: 6. East Carolina: 12. Charlotte: 6. Tulsa: 32
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Michigan State: 1 by 33.3. Army: 3 by 53.3. Florida International: 1 by 40. East Carolina: 1 by 80. Charlotte: 1 by 40. Tulsa: 3 by 71.1
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
6 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Tulsa
Best efficiency game
80 vs East Carolina
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Michigan
2019-2021
Opening stop
Massachusetts
2022-2023
Peak year stop
Florida Atlantic
2024
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | Michigan | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | Michigan | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Michigan | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Massachusetts | 402 | 81.1 | 26.8 | 402 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Massachusetts | 421 | 80.4 | 17 | 19 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Florida Atlantic | 85 | 53 | 9.4 | -336 |
#1 Featured game
Eastern Michigan
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
66
Primary metric
66 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Toledo
60
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
60 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Arkansas State
72
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
72 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Buffalo
52
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
52 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Tulsa
32
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
32 receiving yards with a 71.1 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2021 Regular Season · Michigan
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2023 Regular Season · Massachusetts
69.5
421 primary · 80.4 efficiency · 17 usage
#3
2022 Regular Season · Massachusetts
67.7
402 primary · 81.1 efficiency · 26.8 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2019 · Rating 0.8641
Martin County · Stuart, FL
Career Facts
3
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
908
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 30 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
George Johnson III quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit