Usage Score
18.1
Player Dossier
2019-2024Texas A&M
Garrett Miller
TE • 6'5" • 260 lbs • Round Rock, TX, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Garrett Miller reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
53.4
Consistency
40.3
Season Value
52.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Purdue
19202121222324
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Purdue • Texas A&M
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Northwestern
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Garrett Miller, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Purdue. Garrett Miller reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Garrett Miller played TE for Purdue and Texas A&M. Across 6 tracked seasons, Garrett Miller recorded 456 receiving yards, 6 tackles, and 3 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2023 with Purdue.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season
Purdue paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 53.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2024 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Purdue, Texas A&M.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Minnesota
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 88.9th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2023 Regular Season · Purdue
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
27
Efficiency
53.4
Usage
18.1
Consistency
40.3
Best Game by takeover score
Indiana
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Virginia Tech: 8. Illinois: 31. Iowa: 71. Ohio State: 10. Nebraska: 26. Michigan: 9. Minnesota: 65. Northwestern: 17. Indiana: 6
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Virginia Tech: 1 by 53.3. Illinois: 2 by 100. Iowa: 8 by 59.2. Ohio State: 2 by 33.3. Nebraska: 5 by 34.7. Michigan: 1 by 60. Minnesota: 6 by 72.2. Northwestern: 4 by 28.3. Indiana: 1 by 40
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins27.5 · Games = 4 · +0.9 vs Losses
Losses26.6 · Games = 5 · -0.9 vs Wins
First Half29.2 · Games = 5 · +4.9 vs Second Half
Second Half24.3 · Games = 4 · -4.9 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Minnesota
Best efficiency game
100 vs Illinois
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/25 | vs Indiana | W 35-31 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 11/18 | @ Northwestern | L 15-23 | — | 4 | 17 | 4.3 | 4.30 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 11/11 | vs Minnesota | W 49-30 | — | 6 | 65 | 10.8 | 10.80 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 11/4 | @ Michigan | L 13-41 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/28 | @ Nebraska | L 14-31 | — | 5 | 26 | 5.2 | 5.20 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/14 | vs Ohio State | L 7-41 | — | 2 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 10/7 | @ IowaHigh volume | L 14-20 | — | 8 | 71 | 8.9 | 8.90 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 9/30 | vs Illinois | W 44-19 | — | 2 | 31 | 15.5 | 15.50 | 1 | 28 |
| Sat 9/9 | @ Virginia Tech | W 24-17 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Purdue
2019-2023
Opening stop
- 2
Texas A&M
2024
Final stop
Season Progression
2019202020212021202220232024
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | Purdue | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | Purdue | 48 | 76.7 | 4.3 | 48 |
| 2021 Postseason | Purdue | 165 | 49.4 | 7.3 | 117 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Purdue | 165 | 49.4 | 7.3 | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Purdue | 0 | — | — | -165 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Purdue | 243 | 53.4 | 18.1 | 243 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 0 | — | — | -243 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Northwestern
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
40
Primary metric
40 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Minnesota
65
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
65 receiving yards with a 72.2 efficiency score.
#3
Iowa
71
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
71 receiving yards with a 59.2 efficiency score.
#4
Michigan State
74
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
74 receiving yards with a 61.7 efficiency score.
#5
Illinois
31
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
31 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Regular Season · Purdue
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2023 Regular Season · Purdue
52.7
243 primary · 53.4 efficiency · 18.1 usage
#3
2020 Regular Season · Purdue
40.4
48 primary · 76.7 efficiency · 4.3 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2025 · Rating 0.8706
Cypress Christian School · Cypress, TX
- Committed To
- —
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2025
Career Facts
2
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
456
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 22 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.