Usage Score
4.7
Player Dossier
2019-2023Purdue
Cam Allen
DB • 6'1" • 195 lbs • Bluefield, VA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Cam Allen shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 20.5 disruption score.
Efficiency
19.3
Consistency
44.4
Season Value
19.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Purdue
192021212223
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Purdue
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Minnesota
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Cam Allen, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Purdue. Cam Allen shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 20.5 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season
Purdue paired 10 primary output with 20.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 19.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Maryland
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Regular Season · Purdue
Games
10
Havoc Plays / G
0.6
Efficiency
19.3
Usage
4.7
Consistency
44.4
Best Game by takeover score
Indiana
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Vanderbilt: 0. TCU: 1. Penn State: 0. Maryland: 2. Iowa: 0. Illinois: 1. Nebraska: 1. Northwestern: 1. Wisconsin: 0. Indiana: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Vanderbilt: 1 by 4.2. TCU: 1 by 14.2. Penn State: 1 by 4.2. Maryland: 3 by 32.5. Iowa: 3 by 12.5. Illinois: 6 by 35. Nebraska: 6 by 35. Northwestern: 8 by 43.3. Wisconsin: 2 by 8.3. Indiana: 1 by 4.2
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins1 · Games = 4 · +0.7 vs Losses
Losses0.3 · Games = 6 · -0.7 vs Wins
First Half0.6 · Games = 5 · +0 vs Second Half
Second Half0.6 · Games = 5 · +0 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Maryland
Best efficiency game
43.3 vs Northwestern
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/30 | vs Indiana | L 41-44 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/23 | @ Wisconsin | L 24-45 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/9 | @ Northwestern | W 24-22 | 8 | 7 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/2 | vs Nebraska | W 31-27 | 6 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Illinois | L 6-24 | 6 | 6 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Iowa | L 20-26 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Maryland | W 40-14 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 10/5 | @ Penn State | L 7-35 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | vs TCU | L 13-34 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Vanderbilt | W 42-24 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Purdue
2019-2023
Opening stop
Season Progression
201920202021202120222023
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | Purdue | 6 | 19.3 | 4.7 | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | Purdue | 4 | 25.4 | 8.1 | -2 |
| 2021 Postseason | Purdue | 8.5 | 27.4 | 8.1 | 4.5 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Purdue | 8.5 | 27.4 | 8.1 | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Purdue | 10.5 | 23 | 5.3 | 2 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Purdue | 10 | 20.5 | 4.3 | -0.5 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Minnesota
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 53.8 takeover score.
#2
Iowa
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 49.5 takeover score.
#3
Syracuse
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 48 takeover score.
#4
Nebraska
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 46.8 takeover score.
#5
Maryland
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 45.2 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2023 Regular Season · Purdue
10 primary output · 20.5 efficiency · 4.3 usage
27.2
#2
2022 Regular Season · Purdue
24.9
10.5 primary · 23 efficiency · 5.3 usage
#3
2020 Regular Season · Purdue
20.6
4 primary · 25.4 efficiency · 8.1 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
4
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
195
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 52 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.