Usage Score
26.5
Player Dossier
2019-2021Purdue
David Bell
WR • 6'2" • 205 lbs • Indianapolis, IN, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
David Bell reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
71.3
Consistency
64.3
Season Value
59.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season · Purdue
192021
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Program Path
- Purdue
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Iowa
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
David Bell, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season · Purdue. David Bell reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season
Purdue paired 1,286 primary output with 78.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 71.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2021 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Iowa
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Regular Season · Purdue
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
86.3
Efficiency
71.3
Usage
26.5
Consistency
64.3
Best Game by takeover score
Indiana
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Nevada: 49. Vanderbilt: 82. TCU: -1. Minnesota: 114. Penn State: 56. Maryland: 138. Iowa: 197. Illinois: 18. Nebraska: 23. Northwestern: 115. Wisconsin: 108. Indiana: 136
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Nevada: 1 by 100. Vanderbilt: 4 by 100. TCU: 1 by 0. Minnesota: 8 by 95. Penn State: 3 by 100. Maryland: 9 by 100. Iowa: 13 by 100. Illinois: 5 by 24. Nebraska: 7 by 21.9. Northwestern: 14 by 54.8. Wisconsin: 12 by 60. Indiana: 9 by 100
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins89.5 · Games = 4 · +4.9 vs Losses
Losses84.6 · Games = 8 · -4.9 vs Wins
First Half73 · Games = 6 · -26.5 vs Second Half
Second Half99.5 · Games = 6 · +26.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Iowa
Best efficiency game
100 vs Indiana
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/30 | vs Indiana100 receiving yards · High volume | L 41-44 | — | 9 | 136 | 13.8 | 15.10 | 1 | 31 |
| Sat 11/23 | @ Wisconsin100 receiving yards · High volume | L 24-45 | — | 12 | 108 | 9 | 9 | 1 | 29 |
| Sat 11/9 | @ Northwestern100 receiving yards · High volume | W 24-22 | — | 14 | 115 | 8.2 | 8.20 | 1 | 18 |
| Sat 11/2 | vs Nebraska | W 31-27 | — | 7 | 23 | 4 | 3.30 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Illinois | L 6-24 | — | 5 | 18 | 3.2 | 3.60 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Iowa100 receiving yards · High volume | L 20-26 | — | 13 | 197 | 15.2 | 15.20 | 1 | 54 |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Maryland100 receiving yards · High volume | W 40-14 | — | 9 | 138 | 15.3 | 15.30 | 2 | 30 |
| Sat 10/5 | @ Penn State | L 7-35 | — | 3 | 56 | 18.7 | 18.70 | 0 | 43 |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Minnesota100 receiving yards · High volume | L 31-38 | — | 8 | 114 | 14.3 | 14.30 | 0 | 37 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs TCU | L 13-34 | — | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Vanderbilt | W 42-24 | — | 4 | 82 | 20.5 | 20.50 | 0 | 30 |
| Sat 8/31 | @ Nevada | L 31-34 | — | 1 | 49 | 49 | 49 | 1 | 49 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Purdue
2019-2021
Opening stop
Season Progression
201920202021
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | Purdue | 1,035 | 71.3 | 26.5 | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | Purdue | 625 | 80.8 | 29.7 | -410 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Purdue | 1,286 | 78.1 | 26.1 | 661 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Iowa
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
197
Primary metric
197 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Iowa
240
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
240 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Nebraska
132
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
132 receiving yards with a 88 efficiency score.
#4
Michigan State
217
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
217 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Illinois
122
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
122 receiving yards with a 90.4 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2021 Regular Season · Purdue
1,286 primary output · 78.1 efficiency · 26.1 usage
66.9
#2
2019 Regular Season · Purdue
59.9
1,035 primary · 71.3 efficiency · 26.5 usage
#3
2020 Regular Season · Purdue
59.7
625 primary · 80.8 efficiency · 29.7 usage
Milestones
17
100+ receiving yards
17
8+ catch outings
4
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2019 · Rating 0.9495
Warren Central · Indianapolis, IN
- Committed To
- Purdue
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2019
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
2,946
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 29 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.