Player Stats

D'Andre Ragin College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
115
TFL
21.5
Sacks
11
QB hurries
10
Passes defended
3

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2019 Regular SeasonToledo00-0--0-
2020 Regular SeasonToledo24-0-1020.4
2021 PostseasonToledo8410--033.4
2021 Regular SeasonToledo8832-1033.4
2022 Regular SeasonToledo815202-018.6
2023 PostseasonToledo12310--055.8
2023 Regular SeasonToledo123774.53-055.8
2024 PostseasonToledo13311--065.4
2024 Regular SeasonToledo13416.53.551065.4

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason

Toledo paired 18 primary output with 28 efficiency.

Supporting note

2024 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 28 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Bowling Green

Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 92.3th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2024 Postseason · Toledo

Games

13

Havoc Plays / G

1.4

Efficiency

28

Usage

8.1

Consistency

66.5

Best Game by takeover score

Bowling Green

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Pittsburgh: 2. Duquesne: 1. Massachusetts: 2.5. Mississippi State: 0. Western Kentucky: 0. Miami (OH): 2. Buffalo: 2. Northern Illinois: 2. Bowling Green: 2. Eastern Michigan: 1.5. Central Michigan: 2. Ohio: 1. Akron: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Pittsburgh: 3 by 32.5. Duquesne: 3 by 22.5. Massachusetts: 4 by 41.7. Mississippi State: 1 by 4.2. Western Kentucky: 1 by 4.2. Miami (OH): 1 by 24.2. Buffalo: 4 by 36.7. Northern Illinois: 2 by 28.3. Bowling Green: 4 by 36.7. Eastern Michigan: 6 by 40. Central Michigan: 3 by 32.5. Ohio: 8 by 43.3. Akron: 4 by 16.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1.6 · Games = 8 · +0.6 vs Losses
Losses1 · Games = 5 · -0.6 vs Wins