Player Stats

Jermaine Brown Jr. College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
3,846
Rushing yards
3,068
Receiving yards
778
Touchdowns
31

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2019 PostseasonUAB101129041.5
2019 Regular SeasonUAB104364351241.5
2020 Regular SeasonUAB928124932141.3
2021 PostseasonUAB13654718064.4
2021 Regular SeasonUAB13766584182764.4
2022 PostseasonUAB131221166270.5
2022 Regular SeasonUAB13946832114670.5
2023 Regular SeasonUAB121,2198034161374.8

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season

UAB paired 1,219 primary output with 55 efficiency.

Supporting note

2023 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 55 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Temple

Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2023 Regular Season · UAB

Games

12

Scrimmage Yards / G

101.6

Efficiency

55

Usage

27.4

Consistency

65.8

Best Game by takeover score

Temple

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. North Carolina A&T: 80. Georgia Southern: 54. Louisiana: 6. Georgia: 47. Tulane: 92. South Florida: 136. UTSA: 173. Memphis: 93. Florida Atlantic: 141. Navy: 61. Temple: 173. North Texas: 163

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. North Carolina A&T: 10 by 82.3. Georgia Southern: 17 by 29.6. Louisiana: 3 by 20.8. Georgia: 8 by 48.2. Tulane: 19 by 43.3. South Florida: 20 by 68.6. UTSA: 18 by 69.7. Memphis: 14 by 67.6. Florida Atlantic: 26 by 42.2. Navy: 20 by 35.6. Temple: 25 by 76.6. North Texas: 19 by 76

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins132.5 · Games = 4 · +46.4 vs Losses
Losses86.1 · Games = 8 · -46.4 vs Wins