Player Stats

Damon Miller College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
58
TFL
4
Sacks
1
QB hurries
1
Passes defended
6

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2019 Regular SeasonUAB11-0--037.8
2020 Regular SeasonUAB6252014058
2021 PostseasonUAB73-0--026.8
2021 Regular SeasonUAB71710-1026.8
2022 Regular SeasonUAB00-0--0-
2023 Regular SeasonUAB41211-1033.7

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season

UAB paired 7 primary output with 29 efficiency.

Supporting note

2023 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 20 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2023 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: North Texas

Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2023 Regular Season · UAB

Games

4

Havoc Plays / G

0.8

Efficiency

20

Usage

4

Consistency

38.9

Best Game by takeover score

North Texas

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Louisiana: 1. South Florida: 0. Navy: 0. North Texas: 2

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Louisiana: 2 by 18.3. South Florida: 2 by 8.3. Navy: 6 by 25. North Texas: 2 by 28.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0 · Games = 1 · -1 vs Losses
Losses1 · Games = 3 · +1 vs Wins