Usage Score
2.1
Player Dossier
2019-2023Oklahoma
Jacob Lacey
DL • 6'1" • 280 lbs • Bowling Green, KY, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Jacob Lacey shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 9.3 disruption score.
Efficiency
9.3
Consistency
6.7
Season Value
9.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Notre Dame
19202121222323
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Notre Dame • Oklahoma
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: California
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jacob Lacey, DL. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Notre Dame. Jacob Lacey shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 9.3 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season
Notre Dame paired 5 primary output with 35.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 9.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Notre Dame, Oklahoma.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Texas
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2023 Postseason · Oklahoma
Games
10
Havoc Plays / G
0.3
Efficiency
9.3
Usage
2.1
Consistency
6.7
Best Game by takeover score
Arizona
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arizona: 1. Tulsa: 0. Cincinnati: 0. Iowa State: 0. Texas: 2. UCF: 0. Kansas: 0. Oklahoma State: 0. West Virginia: 0. BYU: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arizona: 1 by 14.2. Tulsa: 1 by 4.2. Cincinnati: 2 by 8.3. Iowa State: 1 by 4.2. Texas: 4 by 36.7. UCF: 1 by 4.2. Kansas: 3 by 12.5. Oklahoma State: 1 by 4.2. West Virginia: 1 by 4.2
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0.3 · Games = 7 · -0.0 vs Losses
Losses0.3 · Games = 3 · +0.0 vs Wins
First Half0.6 · Games = 5 · +0.6 vs Second Half
Second Half0 · Games = 5 · -0.6 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Texas
Best efficiency game
36.7 vs Texas
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/29 | vs Arizona | L 24-38 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/18 | @ BYU | W 31-24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 11/12 | vs West Virginia | W 59-20 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/4 | @ Oklahoma State | L 24-27 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/28 | @ Kansas | L 33-38 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/21 | vs UCF | W 31-29 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/7 | @ Texas | W 34-30 | 4 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/30 | vs Iowa State | W 50-20 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Cincinnati | W 20-6 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | @ Tulsa | W 66-17 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Notre Dame
2019-2022
Opening stop
- 2
Oklahoma
2023
Final stop
Season Progression
2019202020212021202220232023
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 2 | 9.8 | 1.9 | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 2 | 9.2 | 2.2 | 0 |
| 2021 Postseason | Notre Dame | 2 | 8.8 | 3.2 | 0 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 2 | 8.8 | 3.2 | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 5 | 35.4 | 9.1 | 3 |
| 2023 Postseason | Oklahoma | 3 | 9.3 | 2.1 | -2 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 3 | 9.3 | 2.1 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
California
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 59.7 takeover score.
#2
Texas
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 48.5 takeover score.
#3
Virginia
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 46.6 takeover score.
#4
Navy
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 43.7 takeover score.
#5
Wisconsin
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 43.4 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2022 Regular Season · Notre Dame
5 primary output · 35.4 efficiency · 9.1 usage
35.3
#2
2020 Regular Season · Notre Dame
14.5
2 primary · 9.2 efficiency · 2.2 usage
#3
2023 Postseason · Oklahoma
9.5
3 primary · 9.3 efficiency · 2.1 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
1
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2019 · Rating 0.9304
South Warren · Bowling Green, KY
- Committed To
- Notre Dame
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2019
Career Facts
2
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
50
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 32 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.