Player Stats

Terrance Ferguson College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
1,537
Receptions
134
Touchdowns
16

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2021 PostseasonOregon1118043.4
2021 Regular SeasonOregon1116133243.4
2022 PostseasonOregon13584056
2022 Regular SeasonOregon1327307556
2023 PostseasonOregon13218161.3
2023 Regular SeasonOregon1340396561.3
2024 PostseasonOregon12571076.1
2024 Regular SeasonOregon1238520376.1

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason

Oregon paired 591 primary output with 85.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2024 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 85.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Idaho

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2024 Postseason · Oregon

Games

12

Receiving Yards / G

49.3

Efficiency

85.3

Usage

14.8

Consistency

69.8

Best Game by takeover score

Idaho

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Ohio State: 71. Idaho: 87. Boise State: 27. Oregon State: 45. UCLA: 18. Michigan State: 82. Ohio State: 62. Michigan: 34. Maryland: 35. Wisconsin: 52. Washington: 48. Penn State: 30

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ohio State: 5 by 94.7. Idaho: 7 by 82.9. Boise State: 3 by 60. Oregon State: 3 by 100. UCLA: 1 by 100. Michigan State: 2 by 100. Ohio State: 4 by 100. Michigan: 2 by 100. Maryland: 6 by 38.9. Wisconsin: 3 by 100. Washington: 4 by 80. Penn State: 3 by 66.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins47.3 · Games = 11 · -23.7 vs Losses
Losses71 · Games = 1 · +23.7 vs Wins