Player Stats

Audric Estime College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
2,598
Rushing yards
2,321
Receiving yards
277
Touchdowns
30

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2021 PostseasonNotre Dame2-1-10029.9
2021 Regular SeasonNotre Dame261610029.9
2022 PostseasonNotre Dame13103958068.3
2022 Regular SeasonNotre Dame139528251271268.3
2023 Regular SeasonNotre Dame121,4831,3411421885.9

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season

Notre Dame paired 1,483 primary output with 63.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

2023 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 63.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2023 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Stanford

Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2023 Regular Season · Notre Dame

Games

12

Scrimmage Yards / G

123.6

Efficiency

63.4

Usage

37.1

Consistency

80.2

Best Game by takeover score

Stanford

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Tennessee State: 123. Navy: 121. NC State: 156. Central Michigan: 176. Ohio State: 70. Duke: 106. Louisville: 29. USC: 99. Pittsburgh: 130. Clemson: 120. Wake Forest: 115. Stanford: 238

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Tennessee State: 14 by 86.6. Navy: 18 by 65.1. NC State: 16 by 90.6. Central Michigan: 20 by 86.7. Ohio State: 14 by 52.1. Duke: 22 by 48.2. Louisville: 11 by 23.5. USC: 23 by 44.9. Pittsburgh: 21 by 63.3. Clemson: 21 by 55.8. Wake Forest: 22 by 54.5. Stanford: 25 by 89.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins140.4 · Games = 9 · +67.4 vs Losses
Losses73 · Games = 3 · -67.4 vs Wins