Player Stats

Tony Bradford Jr. College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
142
TFL
30.5
Sacks
15
QB hurries
12
Passes defended
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2019 Regular SeasonTexas Tech81321--014.6
2020 Regular SeasonTexas Tech828615-050.9
2021 PostseasonTexas Tech10111--060.2
2021 Regular SeasonTexas Tech103172.512060.2
2022 Regular SeasonTexas Tech122795.55-058
2023 PostseasonTexas Tech1320.50--040.8
2023 Regular SeasonTexas Tech1340541-040.8

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason

Texas Tech paired 14.5 primary output with 27.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

2023 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 21.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Texas

Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2023 Postseason · Texas Tech

Games

13

Havoc Plays / G

0.8

Efficiency

21.5

Usage

6.8

Consistency

30.9

Best Game by takeover score

Texas

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. California: 0.5. Wyoming: 0. Oregon: 0.5. Tarleton State: 0.5. West Virginia: 0. Houston: 2. Baylor: 0. Kansas State: 1. BYU: 0. TCU: 0. Kansas: 3. UCF: 0. Texas: 3

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. California: 2 by 13.3. Wyoming: 3 by 12.5. Oregon: 1 by 9.2. Tarleton State: 2 by 13.3. West Virginia: 2 by 8.3. Houston: 3 by 32.5. Baylor: 2 by 8.3. Kansas State: 2 by 18.3. BYU: 3 by 12.5. TCU: 7 by 29.2. Kansas: 4 by 46.7. UCF: 5 by 20.8. Texas: 6 by 55

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.9 · Games = 7 · +0.1 vs Losses
Losses0.8 · Games = 6 · -0.1 vs Wins