Player Stats

Eric Phillips College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
78
TFL
18
Sacks
8
QB hurries
16
Passes defended
5

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2019 Regular SeasonCincinnati00-0--0-
2020 Regular SeasonCincinnati360.50--010.1
2021 Regular SeasonCincinnati34-01-09.9
2022 Regular SeasonCincinnati12357344052.8
2023 Regular SeasonCincinnati7145.5251059.5
2024 Regular SeasonCincinnati1119536-056.9

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season

Cincinnati paired 13.5 primary output with 27.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

2024 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 19.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Miami (OH)

Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2024 Regular Season · Cincinnati

Games

11

Havoc Plays / G

1.3

Efficiency

19.9

Usage

10.9

Consistency

39.4

Best Game by takeover score

Miami (OH)

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Towson: 3. Pittsburgh: 1. Miami (OH): 4. Houston: 1.5. Texas Tech: 0. UCF: 0. Arizona State: 2. West Virginia: 0.5. Iowa State: 1. Kansas State: 0. TCU: 1

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Towson: 1 by 34.2. Pittsburgh: 2 by 18.3. Miami (OH): 2 by 48.3. Houston: 2 by 23.3. Texas Tech: 1 by 4.2. UCF: 2 by 8.3. Arizona State: 2 by 28.3. West Virginia: 1 by 9.2. Iowa State: 3 by 22.5. Kansas State: 2 by 8.3. TCU: 1 by 14.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins2.1 · Games = 5 · +1.5 vs Losses
Losses0.6 · Games = 6 · -1.5 vs Wins