Usage Score
9.3
Player Dossier
2019-2024Cincinnati
Eric Phillips
DE • 6'3" • 260 lbs • Cincinnati, OH, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Eric Phillips shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 14.5 disruption score.
Efficiency
14.5
Consistency
9.1
Season Value
13.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season · Cincinnati
192021222324
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Cincinnati
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Indiana
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Eric Phillips, DE. Best season Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season · Cincinnati. Eric Phillips shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 14.5 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season
Cincinnati paired 0 primary output with 5.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 14.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2024 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Miami (OH)
Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2024 Regular Season · Cincinnati
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
0.7
Efficiency
14.5
Usage
9.3
Consistency
9.1
Best Game by takeover score
TCU
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 2. Pittsburgh: 0. Miami (OH): 4. Houston: 0.5. Texas Tech: 0. UCF: 0. Arizona State: 0. West Virginia: 0.5. Iowa State: 0. Kansas State: 0. TCU: 1
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 1 by 24.2. Pittsburgh: 2 by 8.3. Miami (OH): 2 by 48.3. Houston: 2 by 13.3. Texas Tech: 1 by 4.2. UCF: 2 by 8.3. Arizona State: 2 by 8.3. West Virginia: 1 by 9.2. Iowa State: 3 by 12.5. Kansas State: 2 by 8.3. TCU: 1 by 14.2
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins1.1 · Games = 4 · +0.9 vs Losses
Losses0.3 · Games = 6 · -0.9 vs Wins
First Half1.1 · Games = 6 · +0.8 vs Second Half
Second Half0.3 · Games = 5 · -0.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Miami (OH)
Best efficiency game
48.3 vs Miami (OH)
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/30 | vs TCU | L 13-20 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/24 | @ Kansas State | L 15-41 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/17 | @ Iowa State | L 17-34 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/9 | vs West Virginia | L 24-31 | 1 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Arizona State | W 24-14 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | @ UCF | W 19-13 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/29 | @ Texas Tech | L 41-44 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Houston | W 34-0 | 2 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | @ Miami (OH)2+ sacks · Splash game | W 27-16 | 2 | 2 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Pittsburgh | L 27-28 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Unknown | — | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Cincinnati
2019-2024
Opening stop
Season Progression
201920202021202220232024
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 0.5 | 10 | 2.4 | 0.5 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 0 | 5.6 | 0.7 | -0.5 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 14 | 23.8 | 6.9 | 14 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 8.5 | 20.5 | 7.8 | -5.5 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 8 | 14.5 | 9.3 | -0.5 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Indiana
Win with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
5
Primary metric
5 disruption/tackle impact with 61.7 takeover score.
#2
Miami (OH)
4
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 57.4 takeover score.
#3
Unknown
3
Primary metric
Game with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 51.6 takeover score.
#4
Tulane
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 43.1 takeover score.
#5
UCF
1.5
Primary metric
Loss with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1.5 disruption/tackle impact with 37.5 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2021 Regular Season · Cincinnati
0 primary output · 5.6 efficiency · 0.7 usage
35.4
#2
2022 Regular Season · Cincinnati
29.4
14 primary · 23.8 efficiency · 6.9 usage
#3
2023 Regular Season · Cincinnati
26.6
8.5 primary · 20.5 efficiency · 7.8 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
3
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2019 · Rating 0.8226
Colerain · Cincinnati, OH
- Committed To
- Cincinnati
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2019
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
78
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 36 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.