Player Stats

Josh McCarty College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
27

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2019 Regular SeasonEastern Michigan00-0--0-
2020 Regular SeasonEastern Michigan00-0--0-
2021 Regular SeasonEastern Michigan00-0--0-
2022 Regular SeasonEastern Michigan810-0--037.7
2023 Regular SeasonEastern Michigan812-0--037.9
2024 Regular SeasonPittsburgh55-0--036.8

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season

Eastern Michigan paired 0 primary output with 6.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2024 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 4.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Eastern Michigan, Pittsburgh.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Clemson

Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2024 Regular Season · Pittsburgh

Games

5

Havoc Plays / G

0

Efficiency

4.2

Usage

0.8

Consistency

100

Best Game by takeover score

Clemson

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Cincinnati: 0. North Carolina: 0. Clemson: 0. Louisville: 0. Boston College: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Cincinnati: 1 by 4.2. North Carolina: 1 by 4.2. Clemson: 2 by 8.3. Boston College: 1 by 4.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0 · Games = 2 · +0 vs Losses
Losses0 · Games = 3 · +0 vs Wins