Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season
Georgia Southern paired 15.5 primary output with 39.7 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Tackles | TFL | Sacks | QB Hur | PD | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | Georgia Southern | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
| 2020 Postseason | Georgia Southern | 12 | 6 | 1 | 0 | - | - | 0 | 50.9 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Georgia Southern | 12 | 61 | 1.5 | 0.5 | - | 7 | 0 | 50.9 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Georgia Southern | 12 | 77 | 4.5 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 66.3 |
| 2022 Postseason | Georgia Southern | 13 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | 61.2 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Georgia Southern | 13 | 93 | 3 | 1.5 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 61.2 |
| 2023 Postseason | West Virginia | 13 | 9 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | 33.9 |
| 2023 Regular Season | West Virginia | 13 | 71 | 1.5 | 0 | - | 4 | 0 | 33.9 |
| 2024 Postseason | West Virginia | 13 | 7 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | 34.2 |
| 2024 Regular Season | West Virginia | 13 | 95 | - | 0 | - | 3 | 2 | 34.2 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season
Georgia Southern paired 15.5 primary output with 39.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 35.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Georgia Southern, West Virginia.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Cincinnati
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
0.4
Efficiency
35.6
Usage
6.7
Consistency
12.8
Best Game by takeover score
Cincinnati
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Memphis: 0. Penn State: 0. UAlbany: 1. Pittsburgh: 0. Kansas: 1. Oklahoma State: 0. Iowa State: 0. Kansas State: 0. Arizona: 0. Cincinnati: 1. Baylor: 0. UCF: 1. Texas Tech: 1
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Memphis: 7 by 29.2. Penn State: 9 by 37.5. UAlbany: 6 by 35. Pittsburgh: 7 by 29.2. Kansas: 7 by 39.2. Oklahoma State: 4 by 16.7. Iowa State: 6 by 25. Kansas State: 6 by 25. Arizona: 8 by 33.3. Cincinnati: 11 by 55.8. Baylor: 15 by 50. UCF: 10 by 51.7. Texas Tech: 6 by 35
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.