Usage Score
17.1
Player Dossier
2017-2021Georgia
Jermaine Johnson
DE • 6'5" • 260 lbs • Eden Prairie, MN, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Jermaine Johnson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 46 disruption score.
Efficiency
46
Consistency
36.6
Season Value
36.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season · Georgia
171819192021
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Georgia • Florida State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jermaine Johnson, DE. Best season Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season · Georgia. Jermaine Johnson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 46 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season
Georgia paired 8 primary output with 31.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 46 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Georgia, Florida State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2021 Regular Season · Florida State
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
2.7
Efficiency
46
Usage
17.1
Consistency
36.6
Best Game by takeover score
Florida
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Notre Dame: 4. Unknown: 8. Wake Forest: 1. Louisville: 2. Syracuse: 1. North Carolina: 2. Massachusetts: 0. Clemson: 3. NC State: 0. Miami: 8. Boston College: 1. Florida: 2
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Notre Dame: 7 by 69.2. Unknown: 11 by 95.8. Wake Forest: 10 by 51.7. Louisville: 3 by 32.5. Syracuse: 7 by 39.2. North Carolina: 6 by 45. Massachusetts: 1 by 4.2. Clemson: 4 by 46.7. NC State: 5 by 20.8. Miami: 7 by 79.2. Boston College: 3 by 22.5. Florida: 6 by 45
Split Comparison
Wins2.4 · n=5 · +0.4 vs Losses
Losses2 · n=6 · -0.4 vs Wins
First Half3 · n=6 · +0.7 vs Second Half
Second Half2.3 · n=6 · -0.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
95.8 vs Unknown
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/27 | @ Florida | L 21-24 | 6 | 4 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/20 | @ Boston College | W 26-23 | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/13 | vs Miami2+ sacks · Splash game | W 31-28 | 7 | 5 | — | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/6 | vs NC State | L 14-28 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/30 | @ ClemsonSplash game | L 20-30 | 4 | 4 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/23 | vs Massachusetts | W 59-3 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/9 | @ North Carolina | W 35-25 | 6 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/2 | vs Syracuse | W 33-30 | 7 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/25 | vs Louisville | L 23-31 | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/18 | @ Wake Forest10+ tackles | L 14-35 | 10 | 6 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/12 | vs Unknown10+ tackles · 2+ sacks | — | 11 | 4 | — | 4 | 3 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 9/5 | vs Notre DameSplash game | L 38-41 | 7 | 2 | — | 2.50 | 1.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Georgia
2017-2020
Opening stop
- 2
Florida State
2021
Final stop
Season Progression
201720182019201920202021
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Regular Season | Georgia | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2018 Regular Season | Georgia | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Georgia | 4.5 | 14.3 | 3.3 | 4.5 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Georgia | 4.5 | 14.3 | 3.3 | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Georgia | 8 | 31.5 | 16.4 | 3.5 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Florida State | 32 | 46 | 17.1 | 24 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with backfield disruption leading the way.
8
Primary metric
8 disruption/tackle impact with 76.8 takeover score.
#2
Miami
8
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
8 disruption/tackle impact with 76.6 takeover score.
#3
Florida
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 51.5 takeover score.
#4
Alabama
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 51.2 takeover score.
#5
Mississippi State
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 48.8 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2020 Regular Season · Georgia
8 primary output · 31.5 efficiency · 16.4 usage
39.8
#2
2021 Regular Season · Florida State
36.2
32 primary · 46 efficiency · 17.1 usage
#3
2019 Postseason · Georgia
8.7
4.5 primary · 14.3 efficiency · 3.3 usage
Milestones
2
Impact games
4
Splash games
2
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2017 · Rating 0.9588
Cedar Grove · Ellenwood, GA
- Committed To
- Georgia
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2017
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
101
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 25 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.