Usage Score
24.6
Player Profile
Emeka Egbuka
WR • 6'1" • 205 lbs • Steilacoom, WA, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Emeka Egbuka reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
78.2
Consistency
75.8
Season Value
67
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason · Ohio State
2121222223232424
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Primary stop by seasons
- Ohio State
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason · Ohio State
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Marshall
Emeka Egbuka, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason · Ohio State. Emeka Egbuka reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason
Ohio State paired 1,151 primary output with 85.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 78.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Marshall
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2024 Postseason · Ohio State
Games
16
Receiving Yards / G
63.2
Efficiency
78.2
Usage
24.6
Consistency
75.8
Best Game by takeover score
Notre Dame
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213141516
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Notre Dame: 64. Texas: 51. Oregon: 72. Tennessee: 81. Akron: 51. Western Michigan: 98. Marshall: 117. Michigan State: 96. Iowa: 71. Oregon: 93. Nebraska: 20. Penn State: 31. Purdue: 10. Northwestern: 25. Indiana: 80. Michigan: 51
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Notre Dame: 6 by 71.1. Texas: 5 by 68. Oregon: 5 by 96. Tennessee: 5 by 100. Akron: 4 by 85. Western Michigan: 5 by 100. Marshall: 5 by 100. Michigan State: 7 by 91.4. Iowa: 9 by 52.6. Oregon: 10 by 62. Nebraska: 3 by 44.4. Penn State: 3 by 68.9. Purdue: 1 by 66.7. Northwestern: 2 by 83.3. Indiana: 7 by 76.2. Michigan: 4 by 85
Split Comparison
Wins61.9 · n=14 · -10.1 vs Losses
Losses72 · n=2 · +10.1 vs Wins
First Half78.8 · n=8 · +31.1 vs Second Half
Second Half47.6 · n=8 · -31.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
16 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Marshall
Best efficiency game
100 vs Tennessee
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/21 | @ Notre Dame | W 34-23 | — | 6 | 64 | 11 | 10.70 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 1/11 | @ Texas | W 28-14 | — | 5 | 51 | 8.5 | 10.20 | 0 | 14 |
| Wed 1/1 | @ Oregon | W 41-21 | — | 5 | 72 | 14.4 | 14.40 | 1 | 42 |
| Sun 12/22 | vs Tennessee | W 42-17 | — | 5 | 81 | 13.3 | 16.20 | 0 | 40 |
| Sat 11/30 | vs Michigan | L 10-13 | — | 4 | 51 | 12.8 | 12.80 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 11/23 | vs Indiana | W 38-15 | — | 7 | 80 | 11.4 | 11.40 | 1 | 25 |
| Sat 11/16 | @ Northwestern | W 31-7 | — | 2 | 25 | 6.7 | 12.50 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 11/9 | vs Purdue | W 45-0 | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 10 |
| Sat 11/2 | @ Penn State | W 20-13 | — | 3 | 31 | 7.4 | 10.30 | 1 | 25 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Nebraska | W 21-17 | — | 3 | 20 | 6.7 | 6.70 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/12 | @ OregonHigh volume | L 31-32 | — | 10 | 93 | 9.4 | 9.30 | 1 | 26 |
| Sat 10/5 | vs IowaHigh volume · 2+ TD | W 35-7 | — | 9 | 71 | 7.9 | 7.90 | 3 | 15 |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Michigan State | W 38-7 | — | 7 | 96 | 13.7 | 13.70 | 1 | 33 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Marshall100 receiving yards | W 49-14 | — | 5 | 117 | 23.4 | 23.40 | 1 | 68 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Western Michigan | W 56-0 | — | 5 | 98 | 19.6 | 19.60 | 0 | 35 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Akron | W 52-6 | — | 4 | 51 | 12.8 | 12.80 | 0 | 19 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Ohio State
2021-2024
Opening stop
Season Progression
20212021202220222023202320242024
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Postseason | Ohio State | 191 | 91.4 | 8.1 | — |
| 2021 Regular Season | Ohio State | 191 | 91.4 | 8.1 | 0 |
| 2022 Postseason | Ohio State | 1,151 | 85.5 | 26.6 | 960 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Ohio State | 1,151 | 85.5 | 26.6 | 0 |
| 2023 Postseason | Ohio State | 514 | 76.3 | 23 | -637 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Ohio State | 514 | 76.3 | 23 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | Ohio State | 1,011 | 78.2 | 24.6 | 497 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Ohio State | 1,011 | 78.2 | 24.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Marshall
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
117
Primary metric
117 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Notre Dame
96
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
96 receiving yards with a 91.4 efficiency score.
#3
Michigan State
143
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
143 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Unknown
94
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
94 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Wisconsin
118
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
118 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2022 Postseason · Ohio State
1,151 primary output · 85.5 efficiency · 26.6 usage
71.9
#2
2022 Regular Season · Ohio State
71.9
1,151 primary · 85.5 efficiency · 26.6 usage
#3
2024 Postseason · Ohio State
67
1,011 primary · 78.2 efficiency · 24.6 usage
Milestones
7
100+ receiving yards
5
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
5★
Class 2021 · Rating 0.9945
Steilacoom · Steilacoom, WA
- Committed To
- Ohio State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2021
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
2,867
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 47 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.