Player Stats

Justin Ball College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
281
Receptions
31
Touchdowns
1

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2019 Regular SeasonVanderbilt0-00-
2020 Regular SeasonVanderbilt11-3027.8
2021 Regular SeasonVanderbilt119045.5
2022 Regular SeasonVanderbilt5567041.9
2023 Regular SeasonVanderbilt915131163.7
2024 Regular SeasonMississippi State6977047.1

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season

Vanderbilt paired 131 primary output with 57.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2024 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 52.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2024 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Vanderbilt, Mississippi State.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Toledo

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2024 Regular Season · Mississippi State

Games

6

Receiving Yards / G

12.8

Efficiency

52.2

Usage

9.8

Consistency

44.7

Best Game by takeover score

Toledo

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Eastern Kentucky: 2. Toledo: 30. Texas: 6. Tennessee: 4. Missouri: 24. Ole Miss: 11

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Eastern Kentucky: 1 by 13.3. Toledo: 2 by 100. Texas: 2 by 20. Tennessee: 1 by 26.7. Missouri: 2 by 80. Ole Miss: 1 by 73.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins2 · Games = 1 · -13 vs Losses
Losses15 · Games = 5 · +13 vs Wins